On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 01:15:58AM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 14.12.2015 23:14, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:43:38PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >> opus_silk.c |2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> cc0c02e14c1bda0ab35813c8d4
On 14.12.2015 23:14, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:43:38PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> opus_silk.c |2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> cc0c02e14c1bda0ab35813c8d4629e742af7d23f
>> 0001-opus_silk-fix-int16_t-overflow-in-silk_stabilize_lsf
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:43:38PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 14.12.2015 02:38, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:51:31PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >> nlsf can be negative, but a negative index for silk_cosine doesn't work.
> >> ---
> >> libavcodec/opus_si
On 14.12.2015 02:38, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:51:31PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> nlsf can be negative, but a negative index for silk_cosine doesn't work.
>> ---
>> libavcodec/opus_silk.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --gi
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:51:31PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> nlsf can be negative, but a negative index for silk_cosine doesn't work.
> ---
> libavcodec/opus_silk.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/opus_silk.c b/libavcodec/opus_silk.c
> i
nlsf can be negative, but a negative index for silk_cosine doesn't work.
---
libavcodec/opus_silk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/opus_silk.c b/libavcodec/opus_silk.c
index 841d1ed..3ac83b8 100644
--- a/libavcodec/opus_silk.c
+++ b/libavcodec/opus_s
