On 8/25/17, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 25 August 2017 at 16:38, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>
>> Instead of returning all zeroes as result and Syy=1.0,
>> place all the K pulses in the first element y[0]
>> and return Syy=K*K.
>>
>> This is how the original opus function handles the case.
>> This
On 8/25/17, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 25 August 2017 at 16:38, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>
>> Instead of returning all zeroes as result and Syy=1.0,
>> place all the K pulses in the first element y[0]
>> and return Syy=K*K.
>>
>> This is how the original opus function handles the case.
>> This
On 25 August 2017 at 16:38, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> Instead of returning all zeroes as result and Syy=1.0,
> place all the K pulses in the first element y[0]
> and return Syy=K*K.
>
> This is how the original opus function handles the case.
> This is how the existing pvq_search_c handles the case
Instead of returning all zeroes as result and Syy=1.0,
place all the K pulses in the first element y[0]
and return Syy=K*K.
This is how the original opus function handles the case.
This is how the existing pvq_search_c handles the case.
Also, according to Rostislav, the encoded all zeros vector
w
