On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:19:48AM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> The soxr resampler is slower and worse than the swr resampler,
> hence drop the former.
With git master of ffmpeg and libsoxr 0.1.1, using default parameters, on x86,
soxr is indeed a little slower than swr; however many wou
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:19:48AM +, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> The soxr resampler is slower and worse than the swr resampler,
> hence drop the former.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> ---
> Changelog | 1 +
> MAINTAINERS | 1
On 3/6/17, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> The soxr resampler is slower and worse than the swr resampler,
> hence drop the former.
Why you think its worse? There are some popular tests with all
resampleres being tested and I can confirm that swr defaults are
hardly better than soxr defaults.
__
On 3/6/2017 12:19 AM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> The soxr resampler is slower and worse than the swr resampler,
> hence drop the former.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
> ---
> Changelog | 1 +
> MAINTAINERS | 1 -
> configure
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017, at 06:19 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> The soxr resampler is slower and worse than the swr resampler,
> hence drop the former.
Can you explain what you mean by "worse"? Not that I don't trust your
judgment, but I'm just curious.
The soxr resampler is slower and worse than the swr resampler,
hence drop the former.
Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov
---
Changelog | 1 +
MAINTAINERS | 1 -
configure | 5 +-
doc/resampler.texi
