On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 07:21:07PM +0300, Ludmila Glinskih wrote:
> Result differs in pkt_duration and time_base.den for some reason.
> Right now it tests only one example (adjusted to match the output).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludmila Glinskih
[...]
> +printf("%d, %10"PRId64", %10"P
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Ludmila Glinskih
wrote:
> вт, 23 июня 2015 г. в 16:21, Ronald S. Bultje :
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Ludmila Glinskih
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +do {
> > > +if (pkt.stream_index != video_stream)
> > > +break;
> >
> >
> > That ch
Result differs in pkt_duration and time_base.den for some reason.
Right now it tests only one example (adjusted to match the output).
Signed-off-by: Ludmila Glinskih
---
libavformat/Makefile| 1 +
libavformat/api-h264-test.c | 183
tests/fat
Hi!
вт, 23 июня 2015 г. в 16:21, Ronald S. Bultje :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Ludmila Glinskih
> wrote:
>
> > +do {
> > +if (pkt.stream_index != video_stream)
> > +break;
>
>
> That check shouldn't be necessary for the last frame. Sorry for missing
> that
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:56:57PM +, Ludmila Glinskih wrote:
> Do you have any ideas why it differs from framecrc result on the same file?
[...]
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/ref/fate/api-h264
> > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> > +#tb 0: 1/120
the timebase and timestamps differ as ffmpeg*.c does
Do you have any ideas why it differs from framecrc result on the same file?
пн, 22 июня 2015 г. в 12:50, Ludmila Glinskih :
> Result differs in pkt_duration and time_base.den for some reason.
> Right now it tests only one example (adjusted to match the output).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludmila Glinskih
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:27 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:05:38 +0300
> Ludmila Glinskih wrote:
>
> > Result differs in pkt_duration and time_base.den for some reason.
> > Right now it tests only one example (adjusted to match the output).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ludmila Glinskih
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:05:38 +0300
Ludmila Glinskih wrote:
> Result differs in pkt_duration and time_base.den for some reason.
> Right now it tests only one example (adjusted to match the output).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludmila Glinskih
> ---
> libavformat/Makefile| 1 +
> libavformat/ap
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Ludmila Glinskih
wrote:
> +do {
> +if (pkt.stream_index != video_stream)
> +break;
That check shouldn't be necessary for the last frame. Sorry for missing
that on the first iteration.
Ronald
_
Result differs in pkt_duration and time_base.den for some reason.
Right now it tests only one example (adjusted to match the output).
Signed-off-by: Ludmila Glinskih
---
libavformat/Makefile| 1 +
libavformat/api-h264-test.c | 187
tests/fat
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 6/22/2015 2:46 PM, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>> afaik in POSIX any non zero value is to be considered an error, also
>> because value ranges on an unsigned byte.
>
> -1 ends up greater than 128, which is reserved by POSIX for system
> sig
On 6/22/2015 2:46 PM, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> afaik in POSIX any non zero value is to be considered an error, also
> because value ranges on an unsigned byte.
-1 ends up greater than 128, which is reserved by POSIX for system
signal info (SIGKILL and pals).
- Derek
_
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
wrote:
> On 6/22/2015 1:32 PM, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
>> video_decode_example can return -1 on error, and this is lost, so
>> you'd better do "return video_decode_example(argv[1]);" to return the
>> value to the caller. Also sometimes you exit(1)
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Ludmila Glinskih
wrote:
> +if (avcodec_decode_video2(ctx, fr, &get_frame, &pkt) < 0 ||
> get_frame == 0)
> +flag = 1;
> +if (get_frame) {
>
This sounds like you want if (avcodec_decode_video2(..) >= 0 && get_frame >
0) {. You can
On 6/22/2015 1:32 PM, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> video_decode_example can return -1 on error, and this is lost, so
> you'd better do "return video_decode_example(argv[1]);" to return the
> value to the caller. Also sometimes you exit(1) and sometimes you
> return -1, maybe you could go with only one
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Ludmila Glinskih wrote:
> +static int video_decode_example(const char *input_filename)
> +{
> +AVCodec *codec = NULL;
> +AVCodecContext *origin_ctx = NULL, *ctx= NULL;
> +AVFrame *fr = NULL;
> +uint8_t *byte_buffer = NULL;
> +AVPacket pkt;
> +
On 6/22/2015 10:50 AM, Ludmila Glinskih wrote:
> +#include "libavformat/internal.h"
What is this for?
- Derek
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:50:22PM +0300, Ludmila Glinskih wrote:
> Result differs in pkt_duration and time_base.den for some reason.
> Right now it tests only one example (adjusted to match the output).
>
[...]
> +pkt.data = NULL;
> +pkt.size = 0;
> +if (pkt.pts == AV_NOPTS_VALUE)
>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:50:21PM +0300, Ludmila Glinskih wrote:
> I really don't know how to avoid warnings in printf.
in:
libavformat/api-h264-test.c: In function ‘video_decode_example’:
libavformat/api-h264-test.c:113:25: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of
type ‘int’, but argument 5 has
Result differs in pkt_duration and time_base.den for some reason.
Right now it tests only one example (adjusted to match the output).
Signed-off-by: Ludmila Glinskih
---
libavformat/Makefile| 1 +
libavformat/api-h264-test.c | 155
tests/fat
I really don't know how to avoid warnings in printf.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
21 matches
Mail list logo
