- 原始信息 由： "Xiang, Haihao" 日期: 2019/5/27
12:53 (GMT+08:00) 收件人： rsbul...@gmail.com, ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org 抄送： "Yan,
CenX" 主题： Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavcodec/vp9: fix
ref-frame size judging method
On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 04:44 +, Xiang, Haihao wrote:
> On T
Please ignore this email because my comment was mixed with yours.
Thanks
Haihao
> On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 08:12 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:14 PM 严小复 mryan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> code”, I'm little confused about the red word,would you mean encode pro
On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 04:44 +, Xiang, Haihao wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 08:12 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:14 PM 严小复 mryan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> code”, I'm little confused about the red word,would you mean encode process
> need validity checks
On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 08:12 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
Hi guys,
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:14 PM 严小复
mailto:mryan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
code”, I'm little confused about the red word,would you mean encode process
need validity checks or there need to check the reference id of each frame?
And
Hi guys,
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:14 PM 严小复 wrote:
> code”, I'm little confused about the red word,would you mean encode process
> need validity checks or there need to check the reference id of each frame?
>
> And this patch will act on decode process, all references have already been
> appoi
Hi, Ronald
Sorry to reply late.
For you question, “we lack per-block reference validity checks in the
block reconstruction
code”, I'm little confused about the red word,would you mean encode process
need validity checks or there need to check the reference id of each frame?
And this patch wi
Hi,
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 2:12 AM Yan, CenX wrote:
> Hi, Ronald
>
>
>
> Sorry to reply late.
>
>
>
> For you question, “we lack per-block reference validity checks in the
> block reconstruction code”, would you mean encode process need validity
> checks?
>
No. The decoder needs validity check
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:03 PM Yan Cen wrote:
> From: Yan Cen
>
> There is no need all reference frame demension is valid in libvpx.
I think you're touching on a bigger issue here: libvpx allows having
invalid (or even missing) references, and we don't. Note that this means we
lack per-
> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf
> Of Yan Cen
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 9:46 AM
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Cc: Yan, CenX
> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavcodec/vp9: fix ref-frame size judging
> method
>
> From
From: Yan Cen
There is no need all reference frame demension is valid in libvpx.
So this change contains three part:
1. Change each judgement's loglevel from "ERROR" to "WARNING"
2. Make sure at least one of frames that this frame references has valid
dimension.
3. All judgements fail would rep
10 matches
Mail list logo
