> Agreed.
I'm good too, thanks for the input.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
> Or is there any reason to not call it what it is (Dish)? There are Sega or
> Nintendo audio decoders and other examples and a cryptic description like
> "DVB 0502" renders it useless for almost everybody.
>
Agreed.
Kieran
>
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing
26, 2025 1:14 AM
> > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > > de...@ffmpeg.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavcodec/mpeg12dec.c:
> rename
> > > 0x0502 CC format
> > >
> > > > they are broadcasting using a variation
ect: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavcodec/mpeg12dec.c: rename
> > 0x0502 CC format
> >
> > > they are broadcasting using a variation of DVB-S (there is no US
> > standard for sat tv), so the current naming is actually valid.
> >
> > This is my understanding
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Marth64
> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2025 1:14 AM
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches de...@ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavcodec/mpeg12dec.c: rename
> 0x0502 C
> they are broadcasting using a variation of DVB-S (there is no US standard for
> sat tv), so the current naming is actually valid.
This is my understanding also, but I do believe there was 1 other
network that used the same variation.
Hence why I suggested a generic name. The counter argument fr
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of
> Scott Theisen
> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2025 12:54 AM
> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavcodec/mpeg12dec.c: rename
> 0x0502 CC format
>
> On 1/25/25 18:28, Kie
On 1/25/25 18:28, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2025, 22:53 Marth64, wrote:
Hello,
I am to blame here for suggesting DVB_0502 as the name.
I realize it was not the best choice and apologize for wasting your
cycles on this.
Looping in Keiran as we had discussed this ove
On Sat, 25 Jan 2025, 22:53 Marth64, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am to blame here for suggesting DVB_0502 as the name.
> I realize it was not the best choice and apologize for wasting your
> cycles on this.
>
> Looping in Keiran as we had discussed this over IRC briefly a few weeks
> back.
> As I don't
Hello,
I am to blame here for suggesting DVB_0502 as the name.
I realize it was not the best choice and apologize for wasting your
cycles on this.
Looping in Keiran as we had discussed this over IRC briefly a few weeks back.
As I don't know how many networks actually use this in the wild, it
coul
On Sat, 25 Jan 2025, Scott Theisen wrote:
The format is used by at least one DVB-S provider, but is not defined in any DVB
standard, so remove references to DVB. Since I don't have any standard that
does define this format, using the magic number as the name seems most
appropriate.
This is
The format is used by at least one DVB-S provider, but is not defined in any DVB
standard, so remove references to DVB. Since I don't have any standard that
does define this format, using the magic number as the name seems most
appropriate.
This is a simple rename, no functional change.
Th
12 matches
Mail list logo
