On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> In the standard library, these are functions. We should match it; there
>> is no reason for these to be macros.
>>
>> While at it, add some trivial comments for re
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> In the standard library, these are functions. We should match it; there
> is no reason for these to be macros.
>
> While at it, add some trivial comments for readability and correct an
> incorrect (at standard double precision) M_L
On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 19:52:21 +0100
Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> Am 24.12.2015 19:34 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" :
> >
> > In the standard library, these are functions. We should match it; there
> > is no reason for these to be macros.
> >
> > While at it, add some trivial comments for readability an
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> Am 24.12.2015 20:01 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" :
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
> wrote:
>> > Am 24.12.2015 19:34 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" >:
>> >>
>> >> In the standard library, these are functions. We shou
Am 24.12.2015 20:01 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" :
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
wrote:
> > Am 24.12.2015 19:34 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" :
> >>
> >> In the standard library, these are functions. We should match it; there
> >> is no reason for these to be macros.
> >>
>
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> Am 24.12.2015 19:34 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" :
>>
>> In the standard library, these are functions. We should match it; there
>> is no reason for these to be macros.
>>
>> While at it, add some trivial comments for readability and corre
Am 24.12.2015 19:34 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" :
>
> In the standard library, these are functions. We should match it; there
> is no reason for these to be macros.
>
> While at it, add some trivial comments for readability and correct an
> incorrect (at standard double precision) M_LN2 constant u
In the standard library, these are functions. We should match it; there
is no reason for these to be macros.
While at it, add some trivial comments for readability and correct an
incorrect (at standard double precision) M_LN2 constant used in the exp2
fallback.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde