On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 9:00 AM James Almer wrote:
> On 11/16/2024 12:57 PM, Pavel Koshevoy wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 9:25 PM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> >
> >> Quoting Pavel Koshevoy (2024-11-15 20:32:21)
> >>> This avoids unpleasant surprises to av_frame_get_buffer callers
> >>> that expli
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 9:25 AM Pavel Koshevoy wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 9:00 AM James Almer wrote:
>
>> On 11/16/2024 12:57 PM, Pavel Koshevoy wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 9:25 PM Anton Khirnov
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Quoting Pavel Koshevoy (2024-11-15 20:32:21)
>> >>> This avoi
On 11/16/2024 12:57 PM, Pavel Koshevoy wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 9:25 PM Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting Pavel Koshevoy (2024-11-15 20:32:21)
This avoids unpleasant surprises to av_frame_get_buffer callers
that explicitly specified 64-byte alignment and didn't get
AVFrame.data pointers that
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 9:25 PM Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Pavel Koshevoy (2024-11-15 20:32:21)
> > This avoids unpleasant surprises to av_frame_get_buffer callers
> > that explicitly specified 64-byte alignment and didn't get
> > AVFrame.data pointers that are 64-byte aligned.
> >
> > For ex
Quoting Pavel Koshevoy (2024-11-15 20:32:21)
> This avoids unpleasant surprises to av_frame_get_buffer callers
> that explicitly specified 64-byte alignment and didn't get
> AVFrame.data pointers that are 64-byte aligned.
>
> For example, see https://github.com/sekrit-twc/zimg/issues/212
>
> Alth
This avoids unpleasant surprises to av_frame_get_buffer callers
that explicitly specified 64-byte alignment and didn't get
AVFrame.data pointers that are 64-byte aligned.
For example, see https://github.com/sekrit-twc/zimg/issues/212
Although the zscale issue has already been resolved by other me