Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: prefer the mp3float decoder to the mp3 decoder

2018-04-01 Thread James Almer
On 3/31/2018 7:59 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On modern x86 systems its around 2x faster. For systems without > FPUs it'll be slower, but our policy is to prefer floating point > implementations and to let users decide what's best (or just not > compile them on systems without FPUs). > > Sig

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: prefer the mp3float decoder to the mp3 decoder

2018-04-01 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 1 April 2018 at 09:56, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 4/1/18, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > > On modern x86 systems its around 2x faster. For systems without > > FPUs it'll be slower, but our policy is to prefer floating point > > implementations and to let users decide what's best (or just not > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: prefer the mp3float decoder to the mp3 decoder

2018-04-01 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/1/18, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > On modern x86 systems its around 2x faster. For systems without > FPUs it'll be slower, but our policy is to prefer floating point > implementations and to let users decide what's best (or just not > compile them on systems without FPUs). > > Signed-off-by:

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: prefer the mp3float decoder to the mp3 decoder

2018-03-31 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On modern x86 systems its around 2x faster. For systems without FPUs it'll be slower, but our policy is to prefer floating point implementations and to let users decide what's best (or just not compile them on systems without FPUs). Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov --- libavcodec/allcodecs.c