On 11/9/2017 1:23 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
>> For now, and only because you looked at the code. But the current code
>> does not follow the documentation, so it is really a fix.
>>
>>
> That type of fix is called a correction.
It's a fix. Relying on internal implementation knowledge is a bu
On 9 November 2017 at 13:15, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le nonidi 19 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Rostislav Pehlivanov a écrit :
> > Its not really a fix since bprint can't return non-ENOMEM. All were
> copied
>
> For now, and only because you looked at the code. But the current code
> does not follow the d
Le nonidi 19 brumaire, an CCXXVI, Rostislav Pehlivanov a écrit :
> Its not really a fix since bprint can't return non-ENOMEM. All were copied
For now, and only because you looked at the code. But the current code
does not follow the documentation, so it is really a fix.
> from one place in the co
On 9 November 2017 at 08:49, Nicolas George wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas George
> ---
> libavcodec/pngdec.c | 18 +-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/pngdec.c b/libavcodec/pngdec.c
> index 20707f0ae5..1d72f9542a 100644
> --- a/liba
Signed-off-by: Nicolas George
---
libavcodec/pngdec.c | 18 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/pngdec.c b/libavcodec/pngdec.c
index 20707f0ae5..1d72f9542a 100644
--- a/libavcodec/pngdec.c
+++ b/libavcodec/pngdec.c
@@ -524,9 +524,9 @@ static
