Hi,
On 25/06/2016 14:15, Clément Bœsch wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:20:35AM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
[...]
Any objection to this patch now?
iam ok with the patch, maybe give others a bit of time to reply
before applying though
Yeah, I'm in no hurry, I just saw this FIXME in the context
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:20:35AM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
[...]
> >>Any objection to this patch now?
> >iam ok with the patch, maybe give others a bit of time to reply
> >before applying though
>
> Yeah, I'm in no hurry, I just saw this FIXME in the context of one of
> Mateo's patches.
> I was
Hi,
On 23/06/2016 22:37, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 03:28:10PM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
Hi,
On 21/06/2016 16:42, Benoit Fouet wrote:
Hi,
On 21/06/2016 16:29, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Benoit Fouet
wrote:
Hi,
On 21/06/2016 14:52, H
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 03:28:10PM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 21/06/2016 16:42, Benoit Fouet wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 21/06/2016 16:29, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Benoit Fouet
> >> wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On 21/06/2016 14:52, Hendrik Leppkes
Hi,
On 21/06/2016 16:42, Benoit Fouet wrote:
Hi,
On 21/06/2016 16:29, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Benoit Fouet
wrote:
Hi,
On 21/06/2016 14:52, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:34:33PM +02
Hi,
On 21/06/2016 16:29, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Benoit Fouet wrote:
Hi,
On 21/06/2016 14:52, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:34:33PM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
Hi,
Unless I totally m
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Benoit Fouet wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 21/06/2016 14:52, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:34:33PM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
Hi,
Unless I totally missed something,
Hi,
On 21/06/2016 14:52, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:34:33PM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
Hi,
Unless I totally missed something, the FIXME in H264ParamSets structure
should be fixed by attached patch.
--
Ben
From 28
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:34:33PM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Unless I totally missed something, the FIXME in H264ParamSets structure
>> should be fixed by attached patch.
>>
>> --
>> Ben
>>
>
>> From 28ae10498f81070539bdb8f40236
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:34:33PM +0200, Benoit Fouet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unless I totally missed something, the FIXME in H264ParamSets structure
> should be fixed by attached patch.
>
> --
> Ben
>
> From 28ae10498f81070539bdb8f40236326743350101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Benoit Fouet
> D
Hi,
Unless I totally missed something, the FIXME in H264ParamSets structure
should be fixed by attached patch.
--
Ben
From 28ae10498f81070539bdb8f40236326743350101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benoit Fouet
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:17:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] h264: make H264ParamSets sps
11 matches
Mail list logo