On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2015 7:50 PM, "Marton Balint" wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>
>>> SDL_CreateMutex and SDL_CreateCond can fail:
>>> https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
>>> This patch makes handling more r
On Sep 30, 2015 7:50 PM, "Marton Balint" wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>
>> SDL_CreateMutex and SDL_CreateCond can fail:
>> https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
>> This patch makes handling more robust in one instance.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> -
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
SDL_CreateMutex and SDL_CreateCond can fail:
https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
This patch makes handling more robust in one instance.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
ffplay.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4
SDL_CreateMutex and SDL_CreateCond can fail:
https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
This patch makes handling more robust in one instance.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
ffplay.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ffplay.c b/ffplay.c
i
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> SDL_CreateMutex and SDL_CreateCond can fail:
> https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
> This patch makes handling more robust in one instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> ---
> ffplay.c | 23 +--
> 1 f
SDL_CreateMutex and SDL_CreateCond can fail:
https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL_CreateMutex.
This patch makes handling more robust in one instance.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
ffplay.c | 23 +--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ffplay.c b/ffpl
