On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:38:46PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Mich
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:38:46PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:55:3
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:38:46PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:55:31PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:55:31PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Hendrik Leppkes
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 4:39 AM,
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:55:31PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> > wrote:
>> >> The log is anyway rounded to an i
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:55:31PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > wrote:
> >> The log is anyway rounded to an integer, so one may use an frexp
> >> based approach. Note that thi
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>> The log is anyway rounded to an integer, so one may use an frexp
>> based approach. Note that this may be made frexpf; if arguments are less than
>> 2^24 there is no loss. Kep
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> The log is anyway rounded to an integer, so one may use an frexp
> based approach. Note that this may be made frexpf; if arguments are less than
> 2^24 there is no loss. Kept as double precision for simplicity; 2^32 is
> exactly represen
The log is anyway rounded to an integer, so one may use an frexp
based approach. Note that this may be made frexpf; if arguments are less than
2^24 there is no loss. Kept as double precision for simplicity; 2^32 is
exactly representable as a double.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
ffmpeg.c