On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:12:01PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> On 11 May 2015 at 16:18, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:55:40PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > > On 8 May 2015 at 14:28, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:43:20PM -0700,
On 11 May 2015 at 16:18, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:55:40PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > On 8 May 2015 at 14:28, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:43:20PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > > > On 8 May 2015 at 12:06, Michael Niedermayer
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:55:40PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> On 8 May 2015 at 14:28, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:43:20PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > > On 8 May 2015 at 12:06, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:50:49AM -0700,
On 8 May 2015 at 14:28, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:43:20PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > On 8 May 2015 at 12:06, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:50:49AM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > > > On 6 May 2015 at 18:03, Michael Niedermayer
>
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:43:20PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> On 8 May 2015 at 12:06, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:50:49AM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > > On 6 May 2015 at 18:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:08:09PM -0700,
On 8 May 2015 at 12:06, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:50:49AM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > On 6 May 2015 at 18:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:08:09PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > > > On 6 May 2015 at 15:06, Michael Niedermayer
>
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:50:49AM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> On 6 May 2015 at 18:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:08:09PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > > On 6 May 2015 at 15:06, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at
On 6 May 2015 at 18:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:08:09PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > On 6 May 2015 at 15:06, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:52:59AM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > > > Newer versions of clang will al
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:08:09PM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> On 6 May 2015 at 15:06, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:52:59AM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > > Newer versions of clang will allocate %rbx as one of the inline asm
> > inputs,
> >
> > Thats gre
On 6 May 2015 at 15:06, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:52:59AM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > Newer versions of clang will allocate %rbx as one of the inline asm
> inputs,
>
> Thats great
>
>
> > even in PIC. This occurs when building ffmpeg with clang
> -fsanitize
Hi
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:52:59AM -0700, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> Newer versions of clang will allocate %rbx as one of the inline asm inputs,
Thats great
> even in PIC. This occurs when building ffmpeg with clang -fsanitize=address
> -O1 -fPIE. Because the asm does clobber %bx whether PIC is o
On 6 May 2015 at 13:08, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Nick Lewycky google.com> writes:
>
> > On 6 May 2015 at 11:58, Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> >
> > > Nick Lewycky google.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > This occurs when building ffmpeg with clang
> > > > -fsanitize=address -O1 -fPIE.
> > >
> > > What is the u
Nick Lewycky google.com> writes:
> On 6 May 2015 at 11:58, Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>
> > Nick Lewycky google.com> writes:
> >
> > > This occurs when building ffmpeg with clang
> > > -fsanitize=address -O1 -fPIE.
> >
> > What is the usecase for -O1?
>
> It's very important for asan. ASan instruments
On 6 May 2015 at 11:58, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Nick Lewycky google.com> writes:
>
> > This occurs when building ffmpeg with clang
> > -fsanitize=address -O1 -fPIE.
>
> What is the usecase for -O1?
>
It's very important for asan. ASan instruments every memory access (outside
inline asm, for n
Nick Lewycky google.com> writes:
> This occurs when building ffmpeg with clang
> -fsanitize=address -O1 -fPIE.
What is the usecase for -O1?
Did you check performance with and without your patch?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@
Newer versions of clang will allocate %rbx as one of the inline asm inputs,
even in PIC. This occurs when building ffmpeg with clang -fsanitize=address
-O1 -fPIE. Because the asm does clobber %bx whether PIC is on or off, just
include %bx in the clobber list regardless of whether PIC is on or off.
16 matches
Mail list logo