On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:19 AM, James Almer wrote:
> Is mxf as output needed for this?
mxf was one of the (relatively few) number of muxers I knew of that
would utilize the provided time base. It's not strictly needed.
> If not, the framemd5() or framecrc()
> fate functions (which use the muxer
On 6/9/2017 7:10 PM, Michael Bradshaw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached patch adds a FATE test for the -time_base option, as
> promised[1] (months ago). This is my first FATE patch, so please be
> sure to check for stupid mistakes and whatnot. I'm happy to revise it
> as needed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Michae
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 03:10:56PM -0700, Michael Bradshaw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached patch adds a FATE test for the -time_base option, as
> promised[1] (months ago). This is my first FATE patch, so please be
> sure to check for stupid mistakes and whatnot. I'm happy to revise it
> as needed.
>
>
Hi,
Attached patch adds a FATE test for the -time_base option, as
promised[1] (months ago). This is my first FATE patch, so please be
sure to check for stupid mistakes and whatnot. I'm happy to revise it
as needed.
Thanks,
--Michael
[1]: http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-March/20943
