On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 10:08:17PM +0530, Vedaa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for the trivial mistakes. I have fixed them in this patch.
> I have also added simple checks for overflow and underflow. Would this
> be sufficient or should I reduce the bits I read from the fuzzer?
its ok but theres a mi
Hi,
Apologies for the trivial mistakes. I have fixed them in this patch.
I have also added simple checks for overflow and underflow. Would this
be sufficient or should I reduce the bits I read from the fuzzer?
I will also submit a pull request to oss-fuzz as soon as this patch is
applied. :)
---
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 04:04:28PM +0530, Vedaa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am applying for GSoC '21. I have attempted to connect fate-integer to the
> fuzzer by using a header file with the test function to ensure code
> reusability. However, the linker is unable to link the function definiton.
> What
Hi,
I am applying for GSoC '21. I have attempted to connect fate-integer to the
fuzzer by using a header file with the test function to ensure code
reusability. However, the linker is unable to link the function definiton.
What changes should I make to properly link the function?
---
Makefile
