Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fate/aac: add missing bitexact flag to some encoder tests

On 8/3/2020 7:25 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 8/3/20, James Almer wrote: >> On 8/2/2020 8:43 PM, James Almer wrote: >>> Will prevet FATE from breaking once LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MINOR is bumped to >>> 100. >>> >>> Reported-by: zane >>> Signed-off-by: James Almer >>> --- >>> If anyone wants to check

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fate/aac: add missing bitexact flag to some encoder tests

On 8/3/20, James Almer wrote: > On 8/2/2020 8:43 PM, James Almer wrote: >> Will prevet FATE from breaking once LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MINOR is bumped to >> 100. >> >> Reported-by: zane >> Signed-off-by: James Almer >> --- >> If anyone wants to check why adding LIBAVCODEC_IDENT to the bitstream (or >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fate/aac: add missing bitexact flag to some encoder tests

On 8/2/2020 8:43 PM, James Almer wrote: > Will prevet FATE from breaking once LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MINOR is bumped to 100. > > Reported-by: zane > Signed-off-by: James Almer > --- > If anyone wants to check why adding LIBAVCODEC_IDENT to the bitstream (or > rather, > its length increasing) in eith

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] fate/aac: add missing bitexact flag to some encoder tests

Will prevet FATE from breaking once LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MINOR is bumped to 100. Reported-by: zane Signed-off-by: James Almer --- If anyone wants to check why adding LIBAVCODEC_IDENT to the bitstream (or rather, its length increasing) in either https://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=blob;f=libav