On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le nonidi 9 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit :
>> long long is already being used in quite a few places in FFmpeg. There
>> is no reason to list it as something to avoid.
>
> IMHO, most of these places should be replaced by m
Le nonidi 9 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit :
> long long is already being used in quite a few places in FFmpeg. There
> is no reason to list it as something to avoid.
IMHO, most of these places should be replaced by more adapted types. With
modern C, having long, long long or shor
long long is already being used in quite a few places in FFmpeg. There
is no reason to list it as something to avoid. Or put in other words, it
is definitely out of place in the surrounding context.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde
---
doc/developer.texi | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
