On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov
wrote:
> On 26 January 2016 at 14:45, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>> Rostislav Pehlivanov gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > -for (y = 0; y < p->height; y += 16) {
>>
>> > -ff_spatial_idwt_slice2(&d, y+16); /* decode */
>>
>
On 26 January 2016 at 14:45, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Rostislav Pehlivanov gmail.com> writes:
>
> > -for (y = 0; y < p->height; y += 16) {
>
> > -ff_spatial_idwt_slice2(&d, y+16); /* decode */
>
> > +for (y = 0; y < p->height; y += 16)
> > +
Rostislav Pehlivanov gmail.com> writes:
> -for (y = 0; y < p->height; y += 16) {
> -ff_spatial_idwt_slice2(&d, y+16); /* decode */
> +for (y = 0; y < p->height; y += 16)
> +ff_spatial_idwt_slice2(&d, y+16);
Sorry if it's just me but don't
This commit adds support for field coding (instead of the traditional
frame coding). In this mode, two fields, each half height, are
transmitted. The decoder does not output a frame for the first field
(the top one since Dirac only supports top field first) but caches it
and interleaves the image d
