On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>>>
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Michael Niedermaye
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:33:54AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:14:44AM +0100, Hendrik Le
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:53:34PM -0400,
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:33:54AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:14:44AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Michael
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:33:54AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:14:44AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Michael
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:33:54AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:14:44AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> > wrote:
>> > > From: Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 02:42:55PM +0100, Clément Bœsch wrote:
[...]
> > > Wasn't there a concern that these emulations don't behave identical to
> > > the C library versions in regards to NaN handling?
> > > I faintly remember something in the previous discussion.
> >
> > yes, i forgot about that
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:33:54AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:14:44AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> > > From: Michael Niedermayer
> > >
> > > This should fix the build failure of avf_showcq
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:53:34PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Micha
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:53:34PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>>> wrote:
>>> > From: Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:53:34PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > From: Michael Niedermayer
>> >
>> > This should fix the build failure of avf_showcqt.c
>> >
>>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:14:44AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>> > From: Michael Niedermayer
>> >
>> > This should fix the build failure of avf_showcqt.c
>> >
>> >
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:14:44AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > From: Michael Niedermayer
> >
> > This should fix the build failure of avf_showcqt.c
> >
> > An alternative solution would be to add a check for fmin/fmax to
> >
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:53:34PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > From: Michael Niedermayer
> >
> > This should fix the build failure of avf_showcqt.c
> >
> > An alternative solution would be to add a check for fmin/fmax to
> >
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> From: Michael Niedermayer
>
> This should fix the build failure of avf_showcqt.c
>
> An alternative solution would be to add a check for fmin/fmax to fate-source
> and
> then to replace them by FFMIN/FFMAX, i can do that if preferred
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> From: Michael Niedermayer
>
> This should fix the build failure of avf_showcqt.c
>
> An alternative solution would be to add a check for fmin/fmax to fate-source
> and
> then to replace them by FFMIN/FFMAX, i can do that if preferred?
From: Michael Niedermayer
This should fix the build failure of avf_showcqt.c
An alternative solution would be to add a check for fmin/fmax to fate-source and
then to replace them by FFMIN/FFMAX, i can do that if preferred?
Untested due to lack of a affected platform
Signed-off-by: Michael Nied
18 matches
Mail list logo
