On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:21:06PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 12:34:07 -0300
> James Almer wrote:
>
> > On 2/8/2018 7:25 AM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > > On 8 February 2018 at 10:06, Nicolas George wrote:
> > >
> > >> Michael Niedermayer (2018-02-08):
> > >>> +1
> > >>
>
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 12:34:07 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 2/8/2018 7:25 AM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> > On 8 February 2018 at 10:06, Nicolas George wrote:
> >
> >> Michael Niedermayer (2018-02-08):
> >>> +1
> >>
> >> I agree too.
> >>
> >> And maybe, since we are reverting something,
On 2/8/2018 1:16 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 8 February 2018 at 13:19, James Almer wrote:
>
>> On 2/8/2018 9:52 AM, wm4 wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:29:11 +
>>> Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
>>>
On 8 February 2018 at 01:08, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018
On 8 February 2018 at 13:19, James Almer wrote:
> On 2/8/2018 9:52 AM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:29:11 +
> > Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> >
> >> On 8 February 2018 at 01:08, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:35 AM, James Almer wrote:
> On 2/7/2018 9:
On 2/8/2018 7:25 AM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 8 February 2018 at 10:06, Nicolas George wrote:
>
>> Michael Niedermayer (2018-02-08):
>>> +1
>>
>> I agree too.
>>
>> And maybe, since we are reverting something, revert the whole series.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Nicolas George
>>
>>
On 2/8/2018 9:52 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:29:11 +
> Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
>
>> On 8 February 2018 at 01:08, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:35 AM, James Almer wrote:
On 2/7/2018 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 12:03:22 +
Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 8 February 2018 at 10:35, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> > Rostislav Pehlivanov (2018-02-08):
> > > We should fix what we have right now. The API looks good too except some
> > > people here feel like they haven't bikeshedded enoug
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 10:29:11 +
Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 8 February 2018 at 01:08, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:35 AM, James Almer wrote:
> > > On 2/7/2018 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:07:39PM +, Josh de Kock wro
On 2/8/2018 7:29 AM, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> On 8 February 2018 at 01:08, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:35 AM, James Almer wrote:
>>> On 2/7/2018 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:07:39PM +, Josh de Kock wrote:
> Yes, my bad. I
On 8 February 2018 at 10:35, Nicolas George wrote:
> Rostislav Pehlivanov (2018-02-08):
> > We should fix what we have right now. The API looks good too except some
> > people here feel like they haven't bikeshedded enough and want to cause
> > even more chaos.
>
> Do you realize that sentence ac
Rostislav Pehlivanov (2018-02-08):
> We should fix what we have right now. The API looks good too except some
> people here feel like they haven't bikeshedded enough and want to cause
> even more chaos.
Do you realize that sentence accuses Michael, Muhammad and me of
pursuing a personal power trip
On 8 February 2018 at 10:06, Nicolas George wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer (2018-02-08):
> > +1
>
> I agree too.
>
> And maybe, since we are reverting something, revert the whole series.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas George
>
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailin
On 8 February 2018 at 01:08, Muhammad Faiz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:35 AM, James Almer wrote:
> > On 2/7/2018 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:07:39PM +, Josh de Kock wrote:
> >>> Yes, my bad. It looked like it worked initially (was more
> >>> worr
Michael Niedermayer (2018-02-08):
> +1
I agree too.
And maybe, since we are reverting something, revert the whole series.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.or
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:35:24PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 2/7/2018 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:07:39PM +, Josh de Kock wrote:
> >> Yes, my bad. It looked like it worked initially (was more
> >> worried about getting a fix out quickly), but it didnt
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 7:35 AM, James Almer wrote:
> On 2/7/2018 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:07:39PM +, Josh de Kock wrote:
>>> Yes, my bad. It looked like it worked initially (was more
>>> worried about getting a fix out quickly), but it didnt. Try this o
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:07:39PM +, Josh de Kock wrote:
> Yes, my bad. It looked like it worked initially (was more
> worried about getting a fix out quickly), but it didnt. Try this one.
>
> ---
> fftools/cmdutils.c | 104
> +
> 1 file c
On 2/7/2018 9:32 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:07:39PM +, Josh de Kock wrote:
>> Yes, my bad. It looked like it worked initially (was more
>> worried about getting a fix out quickly), but it didnt. Try this one.
>>
>> ---
>> fftools/cmdutils.c | 104
>> ++
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:07:39PM +, Josh de Kock wrote:
> Yes, my bad. It looked like it worked initially (was more
> worried about getting a fix out quickly), but it didnt. Try this one.
>
> ---
> fftools/cmdutils.c | 104
> +
> 1 file c
Yes, my bad. It looked like it worked initially (was more
worried about getting a fix out quickly), but it didnt. Try this one.
---
fftools/cmdutils.c | 104 +
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fftools/cmdutils.c b/
20 matches
Mail list logo
