Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): > As already said they are derived from other parts of code or by research, > there is no original source that could be used and written as link in > source code. > > For reverse engineered codecs documenting from which binary blob it > came from is nonsense. I do not

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/31/20, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): >> Always when you appear you must evoke your request that must be >> fulfilled at any costs no matter how useless they are. > > I will not answer this personal attack. You think this is some kind of game, that you will reply only if

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): > Always when you appear you must evoke your request that must be > fulfilled at any costs no matter how useless they are. I will not answer this personal attack. > No existing encoder/decoder document their tables and how they got it, > unless they are part of existin

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/31/20, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): >> Disagree, no it does not, also only you complained about it. > > Do not push this patch unless the origin of all these numbers is > properly documented in the source code. > > I am ready to argue, but I will not spend more text tha

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): > Disagree, no it does not, also only you complained about it. Do not push this patch unless the origin of all these numbers is properly documented in the source code. I am ready to argue, but I will not spend more text than you on it. -- Nicolas George signature

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 7/31/20, Nicolas George wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): >> From 6ec6fb33ac4a21c602b44efa94ff3246a6ea4342 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Paul B Mahol >> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:18:18 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] avcodec: add CFHD encoder >> >> --- >> libavcodec/Makefile| 1 + >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Nicolas George
Paul B Mahol (12020-07-31): > From 6ec6fb33ac4a21c602b44efa94ff3246a6ea4342 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Paul B Mahol > Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 18:18:18 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] avcodec: add CFHD encoder > > --- > libavcodec/Makefile| 1 + > libavcodec/allcodecs.c | 1 + > libavco

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] cineform CFHD additions and improvements

2020-07-31 Thread Paul B Mahol
Hi, updated patches attached. This work is sponsored by VideoLAN. 0001-avcodec-add-CFHD-encoder.patch Description: Binary data 0002-avcodec-cfhd-move-if-else-out-of-loop-in-inverse-tra.patch Description: Binary data 0003-avcodec-cfhd-fix-non-aligned-to-8-height-decoding.patch Description: B