On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 05:55:37PM -0800, Mark Harris wrote:
> On 2018-11-25 17:29, James Almer wrote:
> > On 11/25/2018 10:01 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 01:02:02PM -0800, Mark Harris wrote:
> >>> The alloc_size attribute is valid only on functions that return a
> >
On 2018-11-25 17:29, James Almer wrote:
> On 11/25/2018 10:01 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 01:02:02PM -0800, Mark Harris wrote:
>>> The alloc_size attribute is valid only on functions that return a
>>> pointer. GCC 9 (not yet released) warns about invalid usage:
>>>
>>
On 11/25/2018 10:01 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 01:02:02PM -0800, Mark Harris wrote:
>> The alloc_size attribute is valid only on functions that return a
>> pointer. GCC 9 (not yet released) warns about invalid usage:
>>
>> ./libavutil/mem.h:342:1: warning: 'alloc_size
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 01:02:02PM -0800, Mark Harris wrote:
> The alloc_size attribute is valid only on functions that return a
> pointer. GCC 9 (not yet released) warns about invalid usage:
>
> ./libavutil/mem.h:342:1: warning: 'alloc_size' attribute ignored on a
> function returning int' [-Wa
The alloc_size attribute is valid only on functions that return a
pointer. GCC 9 (not yet released) warns about invalid usage:
./libavutil/mem.h:342:1: warning: 'alloc_size' attribute ignored on a function
returning int' [-Wattributes]
342 | av_alloc_size(2, 3) int av_reallocp_array(void *ptr,
