Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avutil/frame: deprecate palette_has_changed

2023-05-18 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 7:52 AM Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting James Almer (2023-05-18 03:45:09) > > Not only this is information that relies on the concept of a sequence of > > frames, which is completely out of place as a field in AVFrame, but its > > usefulness is also very limited. > > I thin

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avutil/frame: deprecate palette_has_changed

2023-05-17 Thread Anton Khirnov
Quoting James Almer (2023-05-18 03:45:09) > Not only this is information that relies on the concept of a sequence of > frames, which is completely out of place as a field in AVFrame, but its > usefulness is also very limited. I think the wording can be stronger: there are NO known or intended uses

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avutil/frame: deprecate palette_has_changed

2023-05-17 Thread James Almer
Not only this is information that relies on the concept of a sequence of frames, which is completely out of place as a field in AVFrame, but its usefulness is also very limited. Signed-off-by: James Almer --- doc/APIchanges | 3 +++ libavcodec/8bps.c | 13 - l