The existing (and upcoming) available group types are meant to combine several
streams for presentation, with the result being treated as if it was a stream
itself.
For example, a file could export two stream groups of the same type with one of
them as the "default".
Signed-off-by: James Almer
--
On 2/12/2024 6:10 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Quoting James Almer (2024-02-11 00:09:02)
The existing (and upcoming) available group types are meant to combine several
streams for presentation, with the result being treated as if it was a stream
itself.
Only some group types have that semantics. I
bincZSp7HNnyk.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
encrypted.asc
Description: OpenPGP encrypted message
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link abov
Quoting James Almer (2024-02-11 00:09:02)
> The existing (and upcoming) available group types are meant to combine several
> streams for presentation, with the result being treated as if it was a stream
> itself.
Only some group types have that semantics. I'd prefer to either
* move disposition to
The existing (and upcoming) available group types are meant to combine several
streams for presentation, with the result being treated as if it was a stream
itself.
For example, a file could export two stream groups of the same type with one of
them as the "default".
Signed-off-by: James Almer
--
