Hi
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 6:56 AM Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 02:19:52AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 05:30:05PM +0530, Viraaj Raulgaonkar wrote:
> > > Sample rates up to 2^31 - 1 are considered valid, while greater values
>
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 02:19:52AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 05:30:05PM +0530, Viraaj Raulgaonkar wrote:
> > Sample rates up to 2^31 - 1 are considered valid, while greater values
> > are invalid. Removing the check potentially allows the sample rate
> > t
Hi
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 05:30:05PM +0530, Viraaj Raulgaonkar wrote:
> Sample rates up to 2^31 - 1 are considered valid, while greater values
> are invalid. Removing the check potentially allows the sample rate
> to be decoded in all cases instead of halting demux for values
> greater than 2^31
Sample rates up to 2^31 - 1 are considered valid, while greater values
are invalid. Removing the check potentially allows the sample rate
to be decoded in all cases instead of halting demux for values
greater than 2^31 - 1.
Fixes Trac ticket #11361.
---
libavformat/riffdec.c | 5 -
1 file ch
