On 9/9/2017 12:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 04:17:24PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> There's no need to wait for the first packet of every stream now that
>> every bitstream filter behaves as intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>> ---
>> What should we do with
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 04:17:24PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> There's no need to wait for the first packet of every stream now that
> every bitstream filter behaves as intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> What should we do with the AVFMT_FLAG_AUTO_BSF flag? Do we deprecate
> it and f
There's no need to wait for the first packet of every stream now that
every bitstream filter behaves as intended.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
What should we do with the AVFMT_FLAG_AUTO_BSF flag? Do we deprecate
it and force the automatic insertion of muxer-required bitstream
filters now that t
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 05:08:51PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> There's no need to wait for the first packet of every stream now that
> every bitstream filter behaves as intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> What should we do with the AVFMT_FLAG_AUTO_BSF flag? Do we deprecate
> it and f
On 5/26/2017 5:08 PM, James Almer wrote:
> There's no need to wait for the first packet of every stream now that
> every bitstream filter behaves as intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> What should we do with the AVFMT_FLAG_AUTO_BSF flag? Do we deprecate
> it and force the automatic i
There's no need to wait for the first packet of every stream now that
every bitstream filter behaves as intended.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
What should we do with the AVFMT_FLAG_AUTO_BSF flag? Do we deprecate
it and force the automatic insertion of muxer-required bitstream
filters now that t
