On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, at 23:47, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> Given the license difference, the preference of everyone involved with it
How can you speak for "everyone involved"? Don't speak for other, please.
> for LGPL (its only BSD and a separate library because money) I think
It's BSD because
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 at 15:19, James Almer wrote:
> On 9/29/2018 10:14 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 3:02 PM Devin Heitmueller
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 6:04 AM Rostislav Pehlivanov
> >> wrote:
> >>> I'd much rather go with the original intent which wa
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 5:46 PM Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, at 17:32, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 4:37 PM Jean-Baptiste Kempf
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, at 15:14, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > > > I'm still a bit annoyed that this was
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, at 17:32, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 4:37 PM Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, at 15:14, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > > I'm still a bit annoyed that this wasn't even a consideration when it was
> >
> > How do you know it was not consi
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 4:37 PM Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, at 15:14, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > I'm still a bit annoyed that this wasn't even a consideration when it was
>
> How do you know it was not considered?
I took BBB by his word when he said so.
- Hendrik
___
On 9/29/18, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, at 15:14, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> I'm still a bit annoyed that this wasn't even a consideration when it was
>
> How do you know it was not considered?
> Knowing that most developers are part of the FFmpeg/x264/VLC community, you
> ca
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, at 15:14, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> I'm still a bit annoyed that this wasn't even a consideration when it was
How do you know it was not considered?
Knowing that most developers are part of the FFmpeg/x264/VLC community, you can
be sure it was considered.
> decided to move i
On 9/29/2018 10:14 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 3:02 PM Devin Heitmueller
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 6:04 AM Rostislav Pehlivanov
>> wrote:
>>> I'd much rather go with the original intent which was to merge the decoder
>>> into lavc.
>>
>> Ronald can correct me
On 9/29/18, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 6:04 AM Rostislav Pehlivanov
> wrote:
>> I'd much rather go with the original intent which was to merge the decoder
>> into lavc.
>
> Ronald can correct me if I'm wrong, but I suspect a key goal behind
> the decoder was to have a stan
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 3:02 PM Devin Heitmueller
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 6:04 AM Rostislav Pehlivanov
> wrote:
> > I'd much rather go with the original intent which was to merge the decoder
> > into lavc.
>
> Ronald can correct me if I'm wrong, but I suspect a key goal behind
> the de
On 9/29/2018 9:54 AM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 6:04 AM Rostislav Pehlivanov
> wrote:
>> I'd much rather go with the original intent which was to merge the decoder
>> into lavc.
>
> Ronald can correct me if I'm wrong, but I suspect a key goal behind
> the decoder was to h
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 6:04 AM Rostislav Pehlivanov
wrote:
> I'd much rather go with the original intent which was to merge the decoder
> into lavc.
Ronald can correct me if I'm wrong, but I suspect a key goal behind
the decoder was to have a standalone library which could be shared
across a var
On 9/29/2018 8:05 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 12:05 PM Rostislav Pehlivanov
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 22:51, James Almer wrote:
>>
>>> From: Ronald S. Bultje
>>>
>>> Originally written by Ronald S. Bultje, with fixes, optimizations and
>>> improvements by Jam
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 12:05 PM Rostislav Pehlivanov
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 22:51, James Almer wrote:
>
> > From: Ronald S. Bultje
> >
> > Originally written by Ronald S. Bultje, with fixes, optimizations and
> > improvements by James Almer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Almer
> >
>
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 22:51, James Almer wrote:
> From: Ronald S. Bultje
>
> Originally written by Ronald S. Bultje, with fixes, optimizations and
> improvements by James Almer.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>
I'd much rather go with the original intent which was to merge the decoder
into la
From: Ronald S. Bultje
Originally written by Ronald S. Bultje, with fixes, optimizations and
improvements by James Almer.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
Missing Changelog entry and version bump.
configure | 4 +
libavcodec/Makefile| 1 +
libavcodec/allcodecs.c | 1 +
li
16 matches
Mail list logo
