On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:38:23PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:06:27 -0300
> James Almer wrote:
>
> > On 4/14/2016 7:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:25:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:10:09 +0200
> > >> Michael Niedermayer
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:06:27 -0300
James Almer wrote:
> On 4/14/2016 7:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:25:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> >> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:10:09 +0200
> >> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Micha
On 4/14/2016 7:30 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:25:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:10:09 +0200
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:25:43PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:10:09 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> > > sample.
> > >
> >
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:18:10PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 13:10, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > new version of this with improved documentation
> > I intend to apply this soon if noone is against
> >
> >
> > From e500dd31368b760144b1e2b5b09
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:10:09 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> > sample.
> >
> > The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the cod
On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at 13:10, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> new version of this with improved documentation
> I intend to apply this soon if noone is against
>
>
> From e500dd31368b760144b1e2b5b094f73b571b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michael Niedermayer
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:32:07AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> sample.
>
> The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the code was just
> recently added
>
> This fixes the regression about loosing t
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:26:54 +0200
Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:17 PM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:52:51 +0200
> > Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, wm4 wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
> >> > Michael Niedermay
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:17 PM, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:52:51 +0200
> Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, wm4 wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
>> > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:52:51 +0200
Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, wm4 wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
> > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael Niedermayer
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the
On 4/11/16, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael Niedermayer
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:12:20 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> > > sample.
> > >
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:39:57PM +, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> > sample.
> >
> > The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the code was
> >
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:40:43AM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On 4/11/2016 12:32 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> > sample.
> >
> > The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the code was just
> > re
On 4/11/2016 12:32 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> sample.
>
> The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the code was just
> recently added
>
> This fixes the regression about loosing the audio sample pre
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 at 00:33 Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per
> sample.
>
> The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the code was
> just
> recently added
>
> This fixes the regression about loosing the audio sam
The bits_per_raw_sample represents the number of bits of precission per sample.
The field is added at the logical place, not at the end as the code was just
recently added
This fixes the regression about loosing the audio sample precission information
The change in the fate test checksum un-does
19 matches
Mail list logo
