Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 04:15:01PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Le primidi 1er brumaire, an CCXXVI, Ronald S. Bultje a écrit : > > But this is the whole problem. We're stuck in a stalemate between nothing > > and nobody. As with ffserver, we'll keep postponing this forever more until > > the stal

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-24 Thread Nicolas George
Le primidi 1er brumaire, an CCXXVI, Ronald S. Bultje a écrit : > But this is the whole problem. We're stuck in a stalemate between nothing > and nobody. As with ffserver, we'll keep postponing this forever more until > the stalemate is broken. > > What incentive is there for anyone to write a repl

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-23 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Clément Bœsch wrote: > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:09:04PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > [...] > > > > The replacement will never be written if: > > > > a) nobody cares; AND > > > > b) we keep delaying the removal > > > > > > > > I'm considering veto'ing th

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-23 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:09:04PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: [...] > > > The replacement will never be written if: > > > a) nobody cares; AND > > > b) we keep delaying the removal > > > > > > I'm considering veto'ing this patch. > > > > Personally I'm with Clement in this. The deprecation was

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-22 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 9:43 AM, James Almer wrote: > On 10/22/2017 8:26 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Michael Niedermayer > >> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:52:26PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On Sat, Oct

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-22 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 10:43:35AM -0300, James Almer wrote: [...] > Personally I'm with Clement in this. The deprecation was poorly handled, > and the feature currently has no replacement. Michael uses it for > debugging, so removing it does not seem productive. Not just Michael, it's generally a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-22 Thread James Almer
On 10/22/2017 8:26 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:52:26PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Michael Niedermayer >> >>> wrote: >>> This is differe

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-22 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:52:26PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Michael Niedermayer > > > wrote: > > > > > This is different from FF_API_VISMV which is supported through > codecv

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-22 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 11:23:29PM -0300, James Almer wrote: [...] > >> The commit even states it should have removed "all traces of its use", > >> but it looks like with the years more and more code was added to it, > >> seeing the removal commit 8933ac2079644fb09916f1875c569103aefe84b1 in > >> li

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-21 Thread James Almer
On 10/21/2017 11:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:30:45PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >> On 10/21/2017 10:23 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:52:26PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: Hi, On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Michael N

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-21 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:30:45PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 10/21/2017 10:23 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:52:26PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Michael Niedermayer > >> >>> wrote: > >> > >>> This is differ

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-21 Thread James Almer
On 10/21/2017 10:23 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:52:26PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Michael Niedermayer >> wrote: >> >>> This is different from FF_API_VISMV which is supported through codecview. >>> >>> Signed-off-by:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-21 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:52:26PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > This is different from FF_API_VISMV which is supported through codecview. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > > --- > > libavcodec/version.h

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-21 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > This is different from FF_API_VISMV which is supported through codecview. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > --- > libavcodec/version.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/libavcodec/ve

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/version: Postpone FF_API_DEBUG_MV

2017-10-21 Thread Michael Niedermayer
This is different from FF_API_VISMV which is supported through codecview. Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer --- libavcodec/version.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libavcodec/version.h b/libavcodec/version.h index 8584bb7006..25696690d7 100644 --- a/libavcod