On Mon, 25 May 2015 13:14:05 -0700
Philip Langdale wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2015 20:34:34 +0200
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 09:46:14AM -0700, Philip Langdale wrote:
> > > h264.h and hevc.h are mutually exclusive due to defining some of
> > > the same names. As such
On Mon, 25 May 2015 20:34:34 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 09:46:14AM -0700, Philip Langdale wrote:
> > h264.h and hevc.h are mutually exclusive due to defining some of
> > the same names. As such, we need to avoid forcing h264.h to be
> > included if we want hevc dec
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 09:46:14AM -0700, Philip Langdale wrote:
> h264.h and hevc.h are mutually exclusive due to defining some of the same
> names. As such, we need to avoid forcing h264.h to be included if we want
> hevc decode acceleration to be possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale
>
h264.h and hevc.h are mutually exclusive due to defining some of the same
names. As such, we need to avoid forcing h264.h to be included if we want
hevc decode acceleration to be possible.
Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale
---
libavcodec/vc1dec.c | 1 +
libavcodec/vdpau_internal.h | 3 ++-
