Leo Izen:
> On 10/2/23 16:40, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
>> Leo Izen:
>>> The spec caps the prefix alphabet size to 32768 (i.e. 1 << 15) so we
>>> need to check for that and reject alphabets that are too large.
>>
>> No, we don't "need to", we can. FFmpeg is not a validator tool.
>
> We need to bec
On 10/2/23 16:40, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
Leo Izen:
The spec caps the prefix alphabet size to 32768 (i.e. 1 << 15) so we
need to check for that and reject alphabets that are too large.
No, we don't "need to", we can. FFmpeg is not a validator tool.
We need to because we risk over-allocatin
Leo Izen:
> The spec caps the prefix alphabet size to 32768 (i.e. 1 << 15) so we
> need to check for that and reject alphabets that are too large.
No, we don't "need to", we can. FFmpeg is not a validator tool.
>
> Additionally, there's no need to allocate buffers that are as large as
> the maxi
The spec caps the prefix alphabet size to 32768 (i.e. 1 << 15) so we
need to check for that and reject alphabets that are too large.
Additionally, there's no need to allocate buffers that are as large as
the maximum alphabet size as these aren't stack-allocated, they're heap
allocated and thus can
