On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 08:49:49 -0300 James Almer wrote:
> On 8/2/2021 7:36 AM, Niklas Haas wrote:
> > From: Niklas Haas
> >
> > The current code has a number of issues:
> > 1. The fg_model_id is specified in H.274 as u(2), not u(8)
>
> Yes, good catch.
>
> > 2. This SEI has no ue(v) "repetition
On 8/2/2021 7:36 AM, Niklas Haas wrote:
From: Niklas Haas
The current code has a number of issues:
1. The fg_model_id is specified in H.274 as u(2), not u(8)
Yes, good catch.
2. This SEI has no ue(v) "repetition period", but a u(1) persistence flag
This one however isn't. ITU-T H.264 has
From: Niklas Haas
The current code has a number of issues:
1. The fg_model_id is specified in H.274 as u(2), not u(8)
2. This SEI has no ue(v) "repetition period", but a u(1) persistence flag
Additionally, we can get away with using the non-long version of
get_se_golomb() because the SEI spec as
