On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:39 AM, wm4 wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:21:19 +0100
> Steve Lhomme wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> > Steve Lhomme videolabs.io> writes:
>> >
>> >> I implemented the same change in VLC.
>> >
>> > From a quick look, you added
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:21:19 +0100
Steve Lhomme wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Steve Lhomme videolabs.io> writes:
> >
> >> I implemented the same change in VLC.
> >
> > From a quick look, you added code to the decoder
> > wrapper but how is remuxing s
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Steve Lhomme videolabs.io> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> > Steve Lhomme videolabs.io> writes:
>> >
>> >> >> I implemented the same change in VLC.
>> >> >
>> >> > From a quick look, you added c
Steve Lhomme videolabs.io> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Steve Lhomme videolabs.io> writes:
> >
> >> >> I implemented the same change in VLC.
> >> >
> >> > From a quick look, you added code to the decoder
> >> > wrapper but how is remuxing supposed to wo
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Steve Lhomme videolabs.io> writes:
>
>> >> I implemented the same change in VLC.
>> >
>> > From a quick look, you added code to the decoder
>> > wrapper but how is remuxing supposed to work?
>>
>> In VLC ? There's no Matroska muxer so it
Steve Lhomme videolabs.io> writes:
> >> I implemented the same change in VLC.
> >
> > From a quick look, you added code to the decoder
> > wrapper but how is remuxing supposed to work?
>
> In VLC ? There's no Matroska muxer so it would use
> the ffmpeg one.
I mean remuxing to mov as mentioned
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Steve Lhomme videolabs.io> writes:
>
>> I implemented the same change in VLC.
>
> From a quick look, you added code to the decoder
> wrapper but how is remuxing supposed to work?
In VLC ? There's no Matroska muxer so it would use the ff
Steve Lhomme videolabs.io> writes:
> I implemented the same change in VLC.
From a quick look, you added code to the decoder
wrapper but how is remuxing supposed to work?
> But I think it would be better if the decoder works
> with the lighter version of the extra data.
Why?
I mean where woul
> Steve Lhomme gmail.com> writes:
>
>> can be found in such sample
>> http://streams.videolan.org/issues/16620/VLCSupportsample.mkv
>
> The sample works fine here both with current and
> old FFmpeg.
> I believe it should also work with vlc --demux=ffmpeg
It should because the demuxer has to recon
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 05:05:00PM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> From: Steve Lhomme
>
> --
> can be found in such sample
> http://streams.videolan.org/issues/16620/VLCSupportsample.mkv
> ---
> libavcodec/alac.c | 7 +--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
this breaks fate
mak
Steve Lhomme gmail.com> writes:
> can be found in such sample
> http://streams.videolan.org/issues/16620/VLCSupportsample.mkv
The sample works fine here both with current and
old FFmpeg.
I believe it should also work with vlc --demux=ffmpeg
Is vlc supposed to remux alac from mkv to mov?
Does
From: Steve Lhomme
--
can be found in such sample
http://streams.videolan.org/issues/16620/VLCSupportsample.mkv
---
libavcodec/alac.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/alac.c b/libavcodec/alac.c
index fc8bc96..9c9df8f 100644
--- a/libavcodec/a
12 matches
Mail list logo