On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 07:15:11PM -0700, Mark Reid wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Timothy Gu wrote:
>
> > On Aug 12, 2014 6:29 PM, "Mark Reid" wrote:
> >
> > > I didn't realize FFmbc was licensed differently :s. I don't know if it
> > > helps, (IANAL either)
> > > but the same ULs ca
sorry I didn't label this patch as version 3 I'll resend this correctly
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Mark Reid wrote:
> UL values from libMXF
> Fixes Ticket#1554, Ticket#3100 and Ticket#3450
> ---
> libavformat/mxf.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/m
UL values from libMXF
Fixes Ticket#1554, Ticket#3100 and Ticket#3450
---
libavformat/mxf.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavformat/mxf.c b/libavformat/mxf.c
index d20ed94..7d30d65 100644
--- a/libavformat/mxf.c
+++ b/libavformat/mxf.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
const MXFCodecUL
Changes since v2:
*cleaned up commit message
*identified keys as legacy ULs
Mark Reid (1):
added ULs for demuxing avid media composer mxf files
libavformat/mxf.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--
2.0.0
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpe
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Timothy Gu wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2014 6:29 PM, "Mark Reid" wrote:
>
> > I didn't realize FFmbc was licensed differently :s. I don't know if it
> > helps, (IANAL either)
> > but the same ULs can be found in libMXF project, as well as the AAF SDK.
> > I'm not sure ho
On Aug 12, 2014 6:29 PM, "Mark Reid" wrote:
> I didn't realize FFmbc was licensed differently :s. I don't know if it
> helps, (IANAL either)
> but the same ULs can be found in libMXF project, as well as the AAF SDK.
> I'm not sure how to proceed, should I just drop the patch?
Just mention libMXF
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Timothy Gu wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2014 10:41 AM, "Mark Reid" wrote:
>
> > I got the ULs from FMbc version of mxf.c
>
> Isn't FFmbc GPL? You can't use GPL code in LGPL code unless it is not
> copyrightable (which ULs probably are, IANAL) or you have author consent.
On Aug 12, 2014 10:41 AM, "Mark Reid" wrote:
> I got the ULs from FMbc version of mxf.c
Isn't FFmbc GPL? You can't use GPL code in LGPL code unless it is not
copyrightable (which ULs probably are, IANAL) or you have author consent.
[...]
Timothy
___
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Mark Reid gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I got the ULs from FMbc version of mxf.c
>
> Sounds like this could be added to the commit message.
>
> > I tested it out on the follow media submitted
> > by users reporting this problem
> >
> > ticke
Mark Reid gmail.com> writes:
> I got the ULs from FMbc version of mxf.c
Sounds like this could be added to the commit message.
> I tested it out on the follow media submitted
> by users reporting this problem
>
> ticket #1554
> ticket #3100
> ticket #3450
Mentioning these tickets in the comm
hi,
This patch enables demuxing fo MXF files generated for or by Avid Media
Composer.
Avid seems to use different SMPTE universal labels for its video and audio data
definitions then
ones currently in mxf.c. Also they seem to use a differnt UL for DNxHD Codec
ID.
I got the ULs from FMbc version
---
libavformat/mxf.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavformat/mxf.c b/libavformat/mxf.c
index d20ed94..8ebfdf2 100644
--- a/libavformat/mxf.c
+++ b/libavformat/mxf.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
const MXFCodecUL ff_mxf_data_definition_uls[] = {
{ {
0x06,0x0E,0x2B,0x34,0x04,0
12 matches
Mail list logo
