Anton Khirnov:
> Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2021-06-06 19:20:38)
>> Anton Khirnov:
>>> Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2021-06-06 11:13:00)
Anton Khirnov:
> Memory ordering constraints other than the default (sequentially
> consistent) can behave in very unintuitive and unexpected ways, a
Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2021-06-06 19:20:38)
> Anton Khirnov:
> > Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2021-06-06 11:13:00)
> >> Anton Khirnov:
> >>> Memory ordering constraints other than the default (sequentially
> >>> consistent) can behave in very unintuitive and unexpected ways, and so
> >>> should
Anton Khirnov:
> Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2021-06-06 11:13:00)
>> Anton Khirnov:
>>> Memory ordering constraints other than the default (sequentially
>>> consistent) can behave in very unintuitive and unexpected ways, and so
>>> should be avoided unless there is a strong (typically performance)
Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2021-06-06 11:13:00)
> Anton Khirnov:
> > Memory ordering constraints other than the default (sequentially
> > consistent) can behave in very unintuitive and unexpected ways, and so
> > should be avoided unless there is a strong (typically performance)
> > reason for usi
On 6/6/2021 8:39 AM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
James Almer:
On 6/5/2021 11:27 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Memory ordering constraints other than the default (sequentially
consistent) can behave in very unintuitive and unexpected ways, and so
should be avoided unless there is a strong (typically pe
James Almer:
> On 6/5/2021 11:27 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>> Memory ordering constraints other than the default (sequentially
>> consistent) can behave in very unintuitive and unexpected ways, and so
>> should be avoided unless there is a strong (typically performance)
>> reason for using them. Thi
Anton Khirnov:
> Memory ordering constraints other than the default (sequentially
> consistent) can behave in very unintuitive and unexpected ways, and so
> should be avoided unless there is a strong (typically performance)
> reason for using them. This holds especially for memory_order_relaxed,
>
Quoting James Almer (2021-06-05 16:46:01)
> On 6/5/2021 11:27 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > Memory ordering constraints other than the default (sequentially
> > consistent) can behave in very unintuitive and unexpected ways, and so
> > should be avoided unless there is a strong (typically performanc
On 6/5/2021 11:27 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
Memory ordering constraints other than the default (sequentially
consistent) can behave in very unintuitive and unexpected ways, and so
should be avoided unless there is a strong (typically performance)
reason for using them. This holds especially for me
Memory ordering constraints other than the default (sequentially
consistent) can behave in very unintuitive and unexpected ways, and so
should be avoided unless there is a strong (typically performance)
reason for using them. This holds especially for memory_order_relaxed,
which imposes no ordering
10 matches
Mail list logo
