On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> libavcodec/aaccoder.c | 60 --
>>> libavcodec/aaccoder_twoloop.h | 136
>>> --
>>> libavcodec/aacenc.c
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> libavcodec/aaccoder.c | 60 --
>> libavcodec/aaccoder_twoloop.h | 136
>> --
>> libavcodec/aacenc.c |2
>> libavcodec/aacenc_is.c| 11 ++-
>>
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:35:40AM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Claudio Freire
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 16:54 -030
On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 03:35 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
>
> Attached patch does that.
>
Went over the patch, everything me and other people said has been
addressed, so LGTM.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailma
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Claudio Freire
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov
>>> wrote:
On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 16:54 -0300, Claudio Fre
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Claudio Freire
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 16:54 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
Before pushing this, I'd like some feedback,
>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 12:50 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
>> Also I don't see how a static var would help or even be correct here.
>> Perhaps you meant something else?
> static uint8_t cond1 = param1 && param2;
> static uint8_t cond2 =
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 12:50 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
> Also I don't see how a static var would help or even be correct here.
> Perhaps you meant something else?
static uint8_t cond1 = param1 && param2;
static uint8_t cond2 = param3 && !param4;
...etc
return cond1 && cond2;
_
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Claudio Freire
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 16:54 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
Before pushing this, I'd like some feedback,
>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 16:54 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
>>> Before pushing this, I'd like some feedback,
>>> especially about
>>> the implementation of point 3. I'm not sur
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov
wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 16:54 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
>> Before pushing this, I'd like some feedback,
>> especially about
>> the implementation of point 3. I'm not sure the AAC encoder
>> setting the cutoff in the encoder context l
On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 16:54 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
> Before pushing this, I'd like some feedback,
> especially about
> the implementation of point 3. I'm not sure the AAC encoder
> setting the cutoff in the encoder context like this is legal or
> desirable.
I think setting the cutoff is neces
Attached
Before pushing this, I'd like some feedback, especially about
the implementation of point 3. I'm not sure the AAC encoder
setting the cutoff in the encoder context like this is legal or desirable.
It does work quite well, and all attempts to do it otherwise were either
very invasive or re
13 matches
Mail list logo