On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 10:53:47AM +0200, Christophe Gisquet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-07-18 22:24 GMT+02:00 Christophe Gisquet :
> > 014-07-18 17:41 GMT+02:00 Christophe Gisquet :
> >> This is more of an RFC
> >
> > Only a part can apply, Michaël should have a patch with the correct part.
>
> After
Hi,
2014-07-18 22:24 GMT+02:00 Christophe Gisquet :
> 014-07-18 17:41 GMT+02:00 Christophe Gisquet :
>> This is more of an RFC
>
> Only a part can apply, Michaël should have a patch with the correct part.
After more discussion with Mickaël, the patch was more correct than
first thought
Here's an
014-07-18 17:41 GMT+02:00 Christophe Gisquet :
> This is more of an RFC
Only a part can apply, Michaël should have a patch with the correct part.
--
Christophe
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffm
Hi,
HEAD currently does note pass "make fate-hevc THREADS=6" because of a
missing output frame in POC_A. Except for this sequence, the patch
passes for THREADS={2,3,4,6,7} on a 6-cores system.
This is more of an RFC because the value used in reporting surprises
me and my understanding leads to th
