Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-19 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:26 PM Nicolas George wrote: > Ronald S. Bultje (12021-01-18): > > I agree "involved" should be constrained to just be one of the two > parties > > bringing this up to the TC. And yes this can be gamed, everything can. > It's > > meant to prevent extreme cases, not make t

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-19 Thread Nicolas George
Ronald S. Bultje (12021-01-18): > I agree "involved" should be constrained to just be one of the two parties > bringing this up to the TC. And yes this can be gamed, everything can. It's > meant to prevent extreme cases, not make the world a perfect place. We > can't do that with rules alone. I ag

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-18 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:33 PM Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Ronald S. Bultje (2021-01-18 21:12:50) > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:55 PM Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > > > I have at some point touched most major pieces of code in the project. > > > I also have opinions on how many thing

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-18 Thread Anton Khirnov
Quoting Ronald S. Bultje (2021-01-18 21:12:50) > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:55 PM Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > I have at some point touched most major pieces of code in the project. > > I also have opinions on how many things should be done. So according to > > your definition, that makes m

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-18 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:55 PM Anton Khirnov wrote: > I have at some point touched most major pieces of code in the project. > I also have opinions on how many things should be done. So according to > your definition, that makes me biased and disqualified from voting on > almost anything, s

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-18 Thread Anton Khirnov
Quoting Nicolas George (2021-01-18 19:25:39) > Anton Khirnov (12021-01-18): > > For another, they are excluded from having a say precisely in those > > matters where they have most expertise. > > And the matters where they are most biassed. > > What we are talking about is called conflict of inte

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-18 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 7:49 PM Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 1:25 PM Nicolas George wrote: > > > What we are talking about is called conflict of interest. Every > > functioning institution has rules to prevent them. > > > +1 on this. > How do you want to prevent suc

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-18 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 1:25 PM Nicolas George wrote: > What we are talking about is called conflict of interest. Every > functioning institution has rules to prevent them. +1 on this. Ronald ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-18 Thread Nicolas George
Anton Khirnov (12021-01-18): > This wasn't in the previous version IIRC, and does not seem reasonable > to me. It was added at my suggestion, AFAIK. > For one thing, it adds a possibility of a tie, which was impossible with > odd number of TC members. Unless somebody abstains, which is always po

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-18 Thread Lynne
Jan 18, 2021, 12:59 by an...@khirnov.net: > Quoting Lynne (2021-01-11 16:15:06) > >> Jan 11, 2021, 14:03 by j...@videolan.org: >> >> > --- >> > doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md | 89 + >> > 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) >> > create mode 100644 doc/dev_community/

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-18 Thread Anton Khirnov
Quoting Lynne (2021-01-11 16:15:06) > Jan 11, 2021, 14:03 by j...@videolan.org: > > > --- > > doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md | 89 + > > 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md > > > > diff --git a/doc/dev_c

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-18 Thread Anton Khirnov
Quoting Jean-Baptiste Kempf (2021-01-11 14:03:42) > --- > doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md | 89 + > 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md > > diff --git a/doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md > b/doc/dev_

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-11 Thread Lynne
Jan 11, 2021, 14:03 by j...@videolan.org: > --- > doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md | 89 + > 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md > > diff --git a/doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md > b/doc/dev_communit

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC][v2] Tech Resolution Process

2021-01-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Kempf
--- doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md | 89 + 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md diff --git a/doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md b/doc/dev_community/resolution_process.md new file mode 100644 index 0