On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>> > wrote:
>> [...]
>> >>
>> >> IMHO a
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> > wrote:
> [...]
> >>
> >> IMHO a exp10 fallback should be implemented using exp2() if that is
> faster
> >>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> IMHO a exp10 fallback should be implemented using exp2() if that is faster
>> and available.
>
> I don't know whether the fallback should use exp or exp2, need to
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 07:19:50PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> exp10 is a function available in GNU libm. Looks like no other common
>> libm has it. As such, I am mostly neutral about its inclusion, with a
>> very slight bias in
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 07:19:50PM -0800, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> exp10 is a function available in GNU libm. Looks like no other common
> libm has it. As such, I am mostly neutral about its inclusion, with a
> very slight bias in favor since I am actually posting this.
>
> pros:
> 1. It is fas
exp10 is a function available in GNU libm. Looks like no other common
libm has it. As such, I am mostly neutral about its inclusion, with a
very slight bias in favor since I am actually posting this.
pros:
1. It is faster than pow, and has less of a chance of going into one of
the terribly slow pa
