On 9/2/2017 6:51 PM, James Almer wrote:
> On 9/2/2017 6:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 03:00:16PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>>> This flag replaces the deprecated, non-prefixed
>>> HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL
>>> one.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>>> ---
>>>
On 9/2/2017 6:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 03:00:16PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> This flag replaces the deprecated, non-prefixed
>> HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL
>> one.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>> ---
>> No HWAccel uses HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL at
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 03:00:16PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> This flag replaces the deprecated, non-prefixed HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL
> one.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> No HWAccel uses HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL at all. I wonder if we
> shouldn't instead just not bother rep
This flag replaces the deprecated, non-prefixed HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL
one.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
No HWAccel uses HWACCEL_CODEC_CAP_EXPERIMENTAL at all. I wonder if we
shouldn't instead just not bother replacing it and consider adding it
once and if an hwaccel is ever committed i