Hello,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>> $ make fate-pixelutils
>> TESTpixelutils
>> --- ./tests/ref/fate/pixelutils 2014-08-24 12:18:09.0 +0200
>> +++ tests/data/fate/pixelutils 2014-08-24 14:20:02.0 +0200
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> [OK] [UU] SAD [random]
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:21:38PM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Clément Bœsch pkh.me> writes:
>
> > +OBJS-$(CONFIG_PIXELUTILS) += ppc/pixelutils_init.o
> > +
> > ALTIVEC-OBJS += ppc/float_dsp_altivec.o \
> > +ALTIVEC-OBJS-$(CONFIG_PIXELUTILS) += ppc/pixelutils
Clément Bœsch pkh.me> writes:
> +OBJS-$(CONFIG_PIXELUTILS) += ppc/pixelutils_init.o
> +
> ALTIVEC-OBJS += ppc/float_dsp_altivec.o \
> +ALTIVEC-OBJS-$(CONFIG_PIXELUTILS) += ppc/pixelutils_altivec.o \
Something is wrong here, I suspect the "\" have
to be
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 01:29:50PM +0200, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Am 24.08.14 00:23, schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 09:24:33PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> >> --- This is 100% untested and probably doesn't even compile.
> >
> > it does compile, but i dont have a ppc so i
Am 24.08.14 00:23, schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 09:24:33PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>> --- This is 100% untested and probably doesn't even compile.
>
> it does compile, but i dont have a ppc so i cant say if it would work
I can test that later today.
'make test' is w
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 09:24:33PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> ---
> This is 100% untested and probably doesn't even compile.
it does compile, but i dont have a ppc so i cant say if it would work
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
He who knows, do
---
This is 100% untested and probably doesn't even compile.
Can anyone with PPC/Altivec HW test or provide such access?
After the altivec optims are ported we can drop the duplicated version in
libavcodec entirely.
The fate-pixelutils tests should cover the alignment checks; there might be
some
