On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:22:38AM +0530, Umair Khan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Patch attached.
>
> It fixes the fate tests.
> However, there's a slight bug in the encoder in handling the last frame.
> I'll definitely fix it later.
> I hope the patch can be merged in this state.
[...]
> +/**
> + * Quantize
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Patch attached.
>>
>> It fixes the fate tests.
>> However, there's a slight bug in the encoder in handling the last frame.
>> I'll definitely fix it later.
>> I hope the patch can be merged in this state.
>
> no. The last frame
Hi,
> Patch attached.
>
> It fixes the fate tests.
> However, there's a slight bug in the encoder in handling the last frame.
> I'll definitely fix it later.
> I hope the patch can be merged in this state.
no. The last frame has to be handled properly before merging happens.
I'm at LinuxCon & EL
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:47:59PM +0530, Umair Khan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:34:46PM +0530, Umair Khan wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Patches attached. :)
> >>
> >> - Umair
> >
> >> Changelog |1 +
> >> 1 file c
On 8/29/2016 2:17 PM, Umair Khan wrote:
>>> +if (HAVE_MMX)
>>> >> +ff_window_init_mmx(wctx);
>> >
>> > breaks build on non x86 as the function declaration / prototype is
>> > not there in that case
> What should I do with this then? I'm not too aware of how the whole
> code works becaus
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:34:46PM +0530, Umair Khan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Patches attached. :)
>>
>> - Umair
>
>> Changelog |1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> d3f30e62d803d967bd5c27dc5dfad278ce5c02e9
>> 0001-Changelog
> Am 28.08.2016 um 22:11 schrieb Michael Niedermayer :
>
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 09:50:41PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:03:38PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>>> [...]
Also, the changelog en
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 09:50:41PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:03:38PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Also, the changelog entry line can be part of the encoder patch, no
> >> need to have it
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:03:38PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> [...]
>> Also, the changelog entry line can be part of the encoder patch, no
>> need to have it separate.
>
> actually, i was just thinking having Changelog + version + APIC
On 8/28/2016 4:21 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:03:38PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> [...]
>> Also, the changelog entry line can be part of the encoder patch, no
>> need to have it separate.
>
> actually, i was just thinking having Changelog + version + APIChanges
> ch
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:03:38PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
[...]
> Also, the changelog entry line can be part of the encoder patch, no
> need to have it separate.
actually, i was just thinking having Changelog + version + APIChanges
changes separate from the main patch could make sense as these
On 8/28/2016 7:48 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Patches attached. :)
>>
>>
>> Inline asm is unacceptable to get into master.
>
> How should that case be handled then
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:34:46PM +0530, Umair Khan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Patches attached. :)
>
> - Umair
> Changelog |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> d3f30e62d803d967bd5c27dc5dfad278ce5c02e9
> 0001-Changelog-Add-entry-for-ALS-encoder.patch
> From 020370545a82c8c1304ec9c177a75e27e59b
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Umair Khan wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Patches attached. :)
>>
>>
>> Inline asm is unacceptable to get into master.
>
> How should that case be
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Patches attached. :)
>
>
> Inline asm is unacceptable to get into master.
How should that case be handled then?
- Umair
_
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Umair Khan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Patches attached. :)
Inline asm is unacceptable to get into master.
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
16 matches
Mail list logo