On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 22:36:26 + (UTC)
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Philip Langdale overt.org> writes:
>
> > -if (av_vdpau_bind_context(s, ctx->device,
> > ctx->get_proc_address, 0))
> > +if (av_vdpau_bind_context(s, ctx->device,
> > ctx->get_proc_address, AV_HWACCEL_FLAG_IGNORE_LEVEL))
Philip Langdale overt.org> writes:
> -if (av_vdpau_bind_context(s, ctx->device, ctx->get_proc_address, 0))
> +if (av_vdpau_bind_context(s, ctx->device, ctx->get_proc_address,
> AV_HWACCEL_FLAG_IGNORE_LEVEL))
Shouldn't this be the default?
How can a level ever be a reason to fail?
Carl
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:33:18 +0200
wm4 wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 21:27:58 -0700
> Philip Langdale wrote:
>
> > The h264 decoder reports 4.1 as its maximum level, but it will
> > decode 5.1 4K video just fine. In practice, the published level
> > limits in vdpau do not communicate anything th
On Sat, 15 Aug 2015 21:27:58 -0700
Philip Langdale wrote:
> The h264 decoder reports 4.1 as its maximum level, but it will decode
> 5.1 4K video just fine. In practice, the published level limits in
> vdpau do not communicate anything that's actually useful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale
>
The h264 decoder reports 4.1 as its maximum level, but it will decode
5.1 4K video just fine. In practice, the published level limits in
vdpau do not communicate anything that's actually useful.
Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale
---
ffmpeg_vdpau.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(
