Hm, I don't understand, what exactly is the problem? It applies fine for me.
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 11:24:12PM +0700, gh0st wrote:
> > This also fixes the warning.
> >
> > ---
> > libavcodec/vp9.c
This also fixes the warning.
---
libavcodec/vp9.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9.c b/libavcodec/vp9.c
index a71045e..f940d60 100644
--- a/libavcodec/vp9.c
+++ b/libavcodec/vp9.c
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void vp9_await_tile_progress(VP9Contex
Fixed in v2.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 12:55:29AM +0700, Ilia Valiakhmetov wrote:
> > ---
> > libavcodec/internal.h | 4
> > libavcodec/pthread_slice.c | 33 ++---
> > libavcodec/thread.h|
Should be fixed now in PATCHv4, thanks!
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:36:13PM +0700, Ilia Valiakhmetov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Ilia Valiakhmetov
> > ---
> > libavcodec/vp9.c | 608 ++
>
Fixed in PATCHv3
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:22:15AM +0700, Ilia Valiakhmetov wrote:
> > These patches introduce tile threading support for vp9.
> >
> > Tile threading is ~45% faster at 2 threads vs 1.
> > Frame threading is ~55% faste
Yes, you are right, I'll send a patch with this fixed, thanks.
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Ivan Kalvachev
wrote:
> On 6/9/17, Ilia Valiakhmetov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Ilia Valiakhmetov
> > ---
> > libavcodec/x86/vp9dsp_init_16bpp.c| 2 ++
> > libavcodec/x86/vp9intrapred_16bpp.asm
>I know unaligned loads are not as slow as they used to be,
>but could m1 be produced by m2 and palignr?
I am not sure, can you clarify your question?
>From the comment I assume you don't use the extra two bytes
>that you get from the load, as you mark them as "*"
>generic undefined values
No, t
