On Fri, 2023-02-03 at 15:45 +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Andreas Rheinhardt (12023-02-01):
> > "One special guarantee is made in order to simplify the use of unions:
> > if a union contains several structures that share a common initial
> > sequence (see below), and if the union object currently
On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 00:04 +0100, Henrik Gramner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 9:54 PM James Almer wrote:
> > There's also no good way to deprecate a define and replace it with
> > another while informing the library user, so for something purely
> > cosmetic like this i don't think it's worth
On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 15:35 -0300, James Almer wrote:
> I'm not against renaming it to AV_ROUNDED_RSHIFT or similar, but other
> than an entry in APIChanges we have no way to let library users that
> RSHIFT will be removed two or so years from now.
How about:
static inline void __attribute__ ((de
On Sat, 2017-06-10 at 16:18 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> So we are guranteed that anyone who wants to exploit this has the
> ability to do so as long as they can use the search mask and are able
> to remux the data into whatever format they need.
> And i belive this publication of issues is
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 18:18 +0200, wm4 wrote:
> > > p->got_frame = 0;
> > > av_frame_unref(p->frame);
> > > +p->result = 0;
Shouldn't p->result be similarly reset together with p->got_frame also
in ff_thread_decode_frame()? A similar problem seems possible:
- a normal dec
