Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 6.1.1

Hi! I will probably make a 6.1.1 release in maybe 1-3 weeks due to bug/fixes in it. if you want something in it, please backport it now! Any chance of getting the patch submitted in into this or a subsequent release? I ha

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Remove dcbzl check for e500v1 and e500v2 architectures

Rémi Denis-Courmont: Our compiler (powerpc-btech-linux-gnuspe-gcc (crosstool-NG 1.24.0) 8.3.0) recognizes the instruction, so the configure test succeeds, but the CPU (e500v2) crashes if it tries to execute it. Yes? Indeed. I previously had a patch (d5733936d857ce5c7d28c0bc9e89a2e2548f8895)

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Remove dcbzl check for e500v1 and e500v2 architectures

Hi! The DCBZL instruction is not available for the e500v1 and e500v2 architectures, but may still be recognized by the toolchain, so we need to remove the test for it explicitly for these architectures. Isn't this the sort of thing that's supposed ti be guarded by run-time CPU flags rather tha

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Remove dcbzl check for e500v1 and e500v2 architectures

The DCBZL instruction is not available for the e500v1 and e500v2 architectures, but may still be recognized by the toolchain, so we need to remove the test for it explicitly for these architectures. References: PowerPC™ e500 Core Family Reference Manual (Freescale) Found-by: Ståle Kristoffersen

[FFmpeg-devel] PowerPC e500v2: Build system patch needs to be reapplied

Hi! On upgrading our embedded system to ffmpeg version 5.0, I found that the configure patch d5733936d857ce5c7d28c0bc9e89a2e2548f8895 that fixes instruction detection for the PowerPC e500v2 architecture had gone missing, causing ffmpeg to crash with SIGILL. Re-applying the patch and rebuilding f