Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v0] Implement promeg decoder.

2025-01-17 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025, 21:32 Romain Beauxis, wrote: > Le ven. 17 janv. 2025 à 08:32, Kieran Kunhya > a écrit : > > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:24 PM Kieran Kunhya > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:00 PM Romain Beauxis < > romain

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v0] Implement promeg decoder.

2025-01-17 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
and a lot of old third-party products to get right. One change affects another and it's hard to unit test. I also asked developers of proprietary implementations and they said theirs is much more messy but substantially more advanced than mine (doing full matrix recursion). Regards, Kieran

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v0] Implement promeg decoder.

2025-01-17 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> A simple and clean mpeg FEC implementation will do no harm to FFmpeg, > instead it will improve FFmpegs capabilities. For the reasons I have described this is not possible. It's similar to the way the kernel hides all the idiosyncrasies of real world TCP. Kieran

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v0] Implement promeg decoder.

2025-01-17 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
ash, infinite loop etc. Nor can it be "elegant". The reality is it has heuristics to deal with the real world like any loss tolerant protocol. This is in addition to the other issues this implementation has. Regards, Kieran Kunhya ___ ffmpeg-devel mai

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v0] Implement promeg decoder.

2025-01-17 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> Don't assume he will not extend the implementation. Ask him instead what > he plans to do in the long term. > And this could also be marked as experimental, in which case if > abandoned or proven unstable for several real world cases, it can be > removed or disabled. "the most simple and elegant

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v0] Implement promeg decoder.

2025-01-17 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:24 PM Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:00 PM Romain Beauxis > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Le jeu. 16 janv. 2025 à 16:40, Kieran Kunhya > > a écrit : > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 9:35 PM

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v0] Implement promeg decoder.

2025-01-17 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:00 PM Romain Beauxis wrote: > > Hi, > > Le jeu. 16 janv. 2025 à 16:40, Kieran Kunhya > a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 9:35 PM Romain Beauxis > > wrote: > > > > > > Le jeu. 16 janv. 2025 à 14:48, Kieran Kun

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v0] Implement promeg decoder.

2025-01-16 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 9:35 PM Romain Beauxis wrote: > > Le jeu. 16 janv. 2025 à 14:48, Kieran Kunhya > a écrit : > > > > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, 20:15 Romain Beauxis, wrote: > >> > >> This patch implements the decoding logic for the FEC error- > >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v0] Implement promeg decoder.

2025-01-16 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, 20:48 Kieran Kunhya, wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, 20:15 Romain Beauxis, > wrote: > >> This patch implements the decoding logic for the FEC error- >> correction method described in the Pro-MPEG CoP #3-R2 FEC[1] >> >> We are still in the p

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v0] Implement promeg decoder.

2025-01-16 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, 20:15 Romain Beauxis, wrote: > This patch implements the decoding logic for the FEC error- > correction method described in the Pro-MPEG CoP #3-R2 FEC[1] > > We are still in the process of testing this patch with our encoders but > I wanted to send it now in case it could use

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] doc/faq: Anwser some questions about he GA, which keep popping up

2025-01-06 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
by their employers. > + > @bye > -- > Hi Michael, Can you add that you are exempt from this as you are incorruptible? Regards, Kieran Kunhya > ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ff

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

2025-01-02 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> In fact the current developers > already WILL TODAY vote the way their employer wants them to By that argument you will vote the way FFlabs wants to and therefore are biased and must resign. Unless you are somehow incorruptible compared to everyone else? Regards, Kieran

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

2025-01-02 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
where you are in control as usual. Your recent behaviour of condoning censorship during an election and blocking of contributors on spurious grounds shows that. Read Tom's quote again and practice what you preach. Regards, Kieran Kunhya > ___

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg governance

2025-01-02 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025, 06:49 compn, wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 02:23:08 +0000, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 11:10 PM compn wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 17:28:31 +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > > > wrote

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg governance

2025-01-01 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 11:10 PM compn wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 17:28:31 +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > > I personally don't want any control (I am not in GA or CC), I want the > > people to control FFmpeg. > > iirc someone wanted, to

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg governance and accusations

2024-12-31 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> About a timescale, theres not a single proposal. Short of simply > resigning and handing FFmpeg out to some random dictator who picks it up. > > There is a resposibility here. I cannot and will not simply leave FFmpeg > to whoever likes to pick it up Classic tin pot dictator behaviour, setting a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg governance and accusations

2024-12-31 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Tue, 31 Dec 2024, 13:14 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > In case most people want democratication and its actually an important > thing > for them. Then sure we will make it happen eventually. > This is a non trivial problem though but i had a surprising "revelation" > yesterday how this could be

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Vittorio's mailinglist ban, git access removal and message deletion (was: Worsening messages)

2024-12-30 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
just a statement from you saying > you know him and hes still your good friend vittorio > Where's your verification? Any observer can see you are behaving erratically. So why don't you verify yourself? Some Animals are More Equal than Others. Regards, Kieran Kunhya > _

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg governance and accusations

2024-12-30 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
peg-devel/2023-September/314864.html? > I guess there will be votes to remove me from everything. > But dont fear, i will not abuse anything, i will resign from everything that > a correct vote asks me to resign from. Regards, Kieran Kunhya ___ ffmpe

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg governance and accusations

2024-12-30 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
jury and executioner"? If there was a Nobel Prize for Mental Gymnastics, this email would win. Regards, Kieran Kunhya ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/mpeg12dec: fix range for cc_format option

2024-12-28 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 9:59 PM Marth64 wrote: > > After support was added for DVB 0502 Closed Caption coding, What is "DVB 0502"? Kieran ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubsc

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: Your message to ffmpeg-devel awaits moderator approval

2024-12-27 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024, 01:20 James Almer, wrote: > On 12/27/2024 10:15 PM, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 8:04 PM James Almer wrote: > > > >> On 12/27/2024 9:58 PM, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > >>> On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 11:46 AM Michael Niedermayer < > >> mich...@niedermayer.cc

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] github assembly course ?

2024-12-27 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
ay have seen on IRC I am in the process of writing assembly lessons (which I have shared on IRC). Please could I have access to FFmpeg Github so I can publish some assignments. Regards, Kieran Kunhya ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org htt

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Worsening messages

2024-12-27 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> > > On the ffmpeg side, development continued like before, with much less > strife on the mailing-list. And almost every day, Michael would merge > the changes in libav into ffmpeg. That was a tremendous work and I do > not know how Michael managed to keep on top of it for years. We made a > coll

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Worsening messages

2024-12-26 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
Regards, Kieran Kunhya PS Here is a copy of the censored message: Micheal, just as to recap the last few months... - you joined the CC and stalled executive action that would have improved the community (see the various emails you yourself leaked) - you played some fun games with STF to get y

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] doc/community: Add list of prohibited behaviors

2024-12-26 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
nts must not target > individuals. > + Hi Michael, Does your post on X calling VDD attendees "vultures" fall under this? Or was that ok because you decided retroactively that it was a "joke"? Regards, Kieran Kunhya ___ ffm

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Worsening messages

2024-12-25 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
It's Christmas day, give it a rest. Kieran On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 1:31 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi Community, Community Commitee, Moderators > > The message: lists.ffmpeg.org pipermail ffmpeg-devel/2024-December/337868.html > Is unacceptable. We had alot of messages but this one went t

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: Your message to ffmpeg-devel awaits moderator approval

2024-12-22 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024, 15:14 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > I think what we need is some friendly smiles, some mutual respect, > some virtual hugs and mutual tolerance. We can do the opposite, but it > will make noone happier. > translation: everyone must agree with me This plays out the same way

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avcodec/h264: fix stride calculation in slice_table for multi-slice field video deblocking

2024-12-20 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
else { > deblock_topleft = (sl->mb_x > 0); > -- > 2.43.0 Hi Lingyi, Thank you for your patch. Would it be possible to create a FATE test for this? https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/FATE/AddingATest Regards, Kieran Kunhya ___ ffmpeg

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: Your message to ffmpeg-devel awaits moderator approval

2024-12-19 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 9:11 PM compn wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 20:40:55 +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > > Please can you confirm you will be resigning your moderator status in light > > of the election censorship you have undertaken while at t

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: Your message to ffmpeg-devel awaits moderator approval

2024-12-19 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024, 20:38 compn, wrote: > On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 20:35:43 +0000, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2024, 20:30 compn, wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 20:15:10 +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > > > wro

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: Your message to ffmpeg-devel awaits moderator approval

2024-12-19 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024, 20:30 compn, wrote: > On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 20:15:10 +0000, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > > Some Animals are More Equal Than Others. > > > > Kieran > > and now a CC candidate calling devs animals ? > This is one of th

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: Your message to ffmpeg-devel awaits moderator approval

2024-12-19 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 7:52 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi compn > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 06:16:03AM -1000, compn wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 08:58:14 +0000, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > &g

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: CC election

2024-12-19 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 7:25 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi Kieran > > First before replying, id like to say, that i hope we can resolve this and > in the future work together in a mutually more friendly way. > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:18:20PM -0500, Kieran Ku

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: CC election

2024-12-19 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
it not happened? You can't complain it the CC fails to act when it has voted for something to happen but is not capable of acting on the vote. Regards, Kieran Kunhya > ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/

[FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: Your message to ffmpeg-devel awaits moderator approval

2024-12-19 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
ng to happen but is not capable of acting on the vote. Regards, Kieran Kunhya -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024, 08:55 Subject: Your message to ffmpeg-devel awaits moderator approval To: Your mail to 'ffmpeg-devel' with the subject Re: [FFmpeg-d

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: CC election

2024-12-18 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> 1a. Prior context: > For a long time FFmpeg booths where organized by various FFmpeg developers > like Thilo but also others. They where always announced publically, they > surely had a touch of hobbyists and a "non professional" community > > On NAB 2023 theres a booth paid by VideoLabs, with Vi

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavformat/prompeg.c: Add parameters to control FEC ports.

2024-12-13 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024, 16:38 Romain Beauxis, wrote: > Le ven. 13 déc. 2024 à 16:42, Romain Beauxis > a écrit : > > > > This patch adds parameters to pick specific ports for the two FEC error- > > correction streams associated with a Pro-MPEG CoP #3-R2 FEC streams. > > > > Radio France is currently

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 5/7] avformat/mpegts: add s337m support

2024-12-13 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024, 13:41 Niklas Haas, wrote: > On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 01:37:34 +0000 Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel < > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Dec 2024, 00:39 Michael Niedermayer, > > wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > &g

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/7] RFC: complete rework of s337m support

2024-12-13 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024, 10:14 Nicolas George, wrote: > Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (12024-12-13): > > Then the conclusion in your example is wrong. > > No it is not. Either you misunderstood what I explained — I am guessing > you only read it superficially, you did not actuall

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/7] RFC: complete rework of s337m support

2024-12-13 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024, 10:00 Nicolas George, wrote: > Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (12024-12-13): > > Where is the second sample rate stored in wav? > > Nowhere, obviously. I am surprised somebody who has been in the project > for more than 12 years still does not know how it

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/7] RFC: complete rework of s337m support

2024-12-13 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024, 09:31 Nicolas George, wrote: > Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (12024-12-13): > > Does FFmpeg even support a new sample rate per AVFrame? > > Generate a 48000 Hz MP3. > Generate a 32000 Hz MP3. > Concatenate them. > Convert the result to wave. >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/7] RFC: complete rework of s337m support

2024-12-13 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024, 02:46 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 01:40:43AM +0000, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024, 13:07 Nicolas Gaullier, > > > wrote: > > > > > >De : ffmpeg-devel de la

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/7] RFC: complete rework of s337m support

2024-12-12 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024, 13:07 Nicolas Gaullier, wrote: > >De : ffmpeg-devel de la part de Anton > Khirnov > >Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2024 09:36 > > > >I am not intimately familiar with these formats and their mutual > >relationship, so these problems you refer to are not clear to me. > >What I

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 5/7] avformat/mpegts: add s337m support

2024-12-12 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024, 00:39 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 12:54:29PM +, Nicolas Gaullier wrote: > [...] > > This is a significant work with some weird things like dealing with a > truncated sample rate > > and droping one sample from time to time to keep sync. An

[FFmpeg-devel] Coverity access

2024-12-12 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
Hello, This person asked for coverity access: https://x.com/acentauri92/status/1867186643704099105 I don't know if they should have access. Kieran ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel T

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-12-05 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 5:04 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi Kieran > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 09:51:23PM +0000, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > Are you able to document the differences between source.ffmpeg.org and >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/7] RFC: complete rework of s337m support

2024-12-05 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 2:29 PM Nicolas Gaullier wrote: > > >De : Kieran Kunhya > >Envoyé : mercredi 4 décembre 2024 23:06 > > > >> - a s337m decoder: it includes a resampler: output and input sample_rate > >> are the same, sync is always correct. It would b

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/7] RFC: complete rework of s337m support

2024-12-04 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> - a s337m decoder: it includes a resampler: output and input sample_rate > are the same, sync is always correct. It would be possible to implement > a full pcm fallback, but currently only a silence/pcm fallback is > provided. A 'passthrough' option is also provided and would make it > possible t

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] infrastructure documentation

2024-12-04 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
ccess this resource." Regards, Kieran Kunhya PS: This also begs the question what the issue is with VideoLAN hosting gitlab if they already host (some?) of our Git On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 8:03 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 09:12:55AM -1000, com

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/infra: List at what companies the name servers are hosted and who provides the servers

2024-11-27 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024, 16:56 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > Hi Kieran > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 12:01:03AM +0000, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, 23:32 Michael Niedermayer, > > wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Nied

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/infra: List at what companies the name servers are hosted and who provides the servers

2024-11-26 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
4-11-22", though I accept this could be a coincidence. https://who.is/whois/avcodec.org Regards, Kieran Kunhya ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] doc/infra: clarify domain name servers

2024-11-26 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024, 20:36 James Almer, wrote: > On 11/20/2024 5:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 07:00:47PM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 6:23 PM Michael Niedermayer < > mich...@niedermayer.cc> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Signed-off-by: Micha

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Discussion about mails from 9 years ago Was: [PATCH 1/2] doc/community: Add a standard set of rules for software development mailing lists

2024-11-24 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Sun, 24 Nov 2024, 19:09 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > And i hear almost everyone at VDD are old man. FFmpeg cannot be run by > just old man. There is a need for young people and need for new ideas. Then stop blocking a move to Gitlab based on false concerns of paranoia. Using a mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Discussion about mails from 9 years ago Was: [PATCH 1/2] doc/community: Add a standard set of rules for software development mailing lists

2024-11-24 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Sun, 24 Nov 2024, 19:09 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > Hi Kieran > > I think this is off topic for this thread, but i will reply with adjusted > Subject and as a new thread > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 02:58:29PM +0000, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] doc/community: Add a standard set of rules for software development mailing lists

2024-11-24 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
gt; Like other rules, fair enforcement depends on context and community input. Hi Michael, Seeing as you are (disrespectfully) using an LLM to answer Mailing List emails, I thought I would do the same: Question: "In the following email, confirm that Michael Niedermayer agrees to give root acc

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] doc/developer: Document how disagreements should be handled

2024-11-17 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024, 10:03 Anton Khirnov, wrote: > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-11-17 01:42:20) > > I think this would work better than TC or nothing process. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > > --- > > doc/developer.texi | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] dormant git accounts

2024-11-12 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024, 00:10 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 10:38:09PM +0000, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Nov 2024, 21:03 Michael Niedermayer, > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 05:32:40PM +0

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] dormant git accounts

2024-11-12 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024, 21:03 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 05:32:40PM +, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > > On 11/12/2024 5:07 PM, James Almer wrote: > > > I personally don't agree with giving the domain/trademark to the > general > > > assembly, as some have argued. It's just

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] remove arpi from MAINTAINERS

2024-11-12 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024, 04:07 compn, wrote: > haven't seen arpi in a while so remove his root authorized key + remove > him from maintainers. maybe he'll come back? > > anyone know how to contact tim nicholson? his mails are > bouncing. https://uk.linkedin.com/in/tim-nicholson-7a2a3963 This is all

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] dormant git accounts

2024-11-11 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:31 PM compn wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:00:42 + > Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > > > This only convinces me further that it this whole setup ins't for for > > purpose, and is being run by people who have no concept of actual > > security. This is totally insane. > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] libavfilter: integral images and minkowski pooling for SSIM - ping

2024-11-09 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024, 07:25 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 07:32:20PM +0200, AndreaMastroberti wrote: > > --- > > doc/filters.texi | 14 +++ > > libavfilter/ssim.h| 6 + > > libavfilter/version.h | 4 +- > > libavfilter/vf_ssim.c | 277

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] libpostproc splitout

2024-11-07 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024, 06:07 Vittorio Giovara, wrote: > On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 1:03 PM Michael Niedermayer > > wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 12:11:49AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > Should libpostproc be split out into a seperate source repository

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH, v3] avcodec/amfenc: increase precision of Sleep() on Windows

2024-10-31 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:54 PM Dmitrii Ovchinnikov wrote: > > If there are no comments, I plan to merge this patch at the end of the > week. I will update the title and description to match the current version > of the patch. IMO patches like this playing with sleep() are completely unacceptable

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] A change in r_frame_rate values after upgrade to FFmpeg 6.1

2024-09-23 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 8:56 PM Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel (2024-09-23 21:30:09) > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 4:45 PM Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:27 PM

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] A change in r_frame_rate values after upgrade to FFmpeg 6.1

2024-09-23 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 4:45 PM Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:27 PM Anton Khirnov wrote: >> > >> > Quoting Antoni Bizoń (2024-09-23 10:09:51) >> > > I understand that the r_frame_rate is the lowest f

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] A change in r_frame_rate values after upgrade to FFmpeg 6.1

2024-09-23 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:27 PM Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Antoni Bizoń (2024-09-23 10:09:51) > > I understand that the r_frame_rate is the lowest framerate with which > > all timestamps can be represented accurately. And I know it is just a > > guess. But why did the logic behind the calcul

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH, v2] avcodec/amfenc: increase precision of Sleep() on Windows

2024-08-21 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 7:31 PM Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > > On 19.08.2024 16:23, Araz Iusubov wrote: > > From: Evgeny Pavlov > > > > This commit increase precision of Sleep() function on Windows. > > This fix reduces the sleep time on Windows to improve AMF encoding > > performance on low resolu

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avcodec/h264dec: Remove ff_h264_draw_horiz_band

2024-06-14 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 1:53 PM Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 2:41 PM Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 2:39 AM Andreas Rheinhardt >> wrote: >> > >> > The H.264 decoder does not

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avcodec/h264dec: Remove ff_h264_draw_horiz_band

2024-06-14 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 2:39 AM Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: > > The H.264 decoder does not support draw_horiz_band (it does not have > the AV_CODEC_CAP_DRAW_HORIZ_BAND), making ff_h264_draw_horiz_band() > legally dead. The function here always calls draw_horiz_band > in coded order, although the defa

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] avcodec: add external dec libvvdec for H266/VVC

2024-05-17 Thread Kieran Kunhya
In this project we prefer internal decoders to external libs. On Fri, 17 May 2024, 18:20 Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel, < ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > On May 14, 2024, at 9:28 AM, Lynne via ffmpeg-devel < > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > On 14/05/2024 17:09, Christian Bart

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/h264_slice: Remove dead sps check

2024-05-12 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Mon, 13 May 2024, 02:32 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 03:23:07AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Fixes: CID1439574 Dereference after null check > > > > Sponsored-by: Sovereign Tech Fund > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > > --- > > libavcodec/h264_slice.c |

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

2024-05-02 Thread Kieran Kunhya
Sent from my mobile device On Thu, 2 May 2024, 15:54 Ondřej Fiala, wrote: > On Wed May 1, 2024 at 1:01 AM CEST, Andrew Sayers wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 09:05:05PM +0200, Ondřej Fiala wrote: > > > [...] > > > > IMHO, GitHub have improved that user experience significantly in recent > yea

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avutil/frame: flag A53_CC side data type as allowing multiple entries

2024-04-11 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024, 16:42 James Almer, wrote: > Some interlaced h264 samples may export one caption per field. > > Signed-off-by: James Almer > --- > libavutil/frame.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/libavutil/frame.c b/libavutil/frame.c > index 0775e2a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [EXT] Re: Query from Reuters on XZ, open source, and Microsoft

2024-04-03 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
the rest of my thoughts. Microsoft are not the only company with this attitude. Regards, Kieran Kunhya > >- > > Raphael > > > > *From:* Kieran Kunhya > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2024 12:39 PM > *To:* FFmpeg development discussions and patches > *Cc:* Satter,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Query from Reuters on XZ, open source, and Microsoft

2024-04-03 Thread Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel
reed otherwise. Regards, Kieran Kunhya On Wed, 3 Apr 2024, 16:52 Satter, Raphael (Reuters) via ffmpeg-devel, < ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > Dear FFMPEG community, > > This is Raphael Satter, a journalist with Reuters. I saw your thread on X > about your experience with Mi

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] web/download: Extend the verification procedure to check for difference between git and release tarball

2024-03-30 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 at 17:30, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 11:51:17AM -0300, James Almer wrote: > > On 3/30/2024 11:02 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Iam not 100% sure this is the best place to put this. But we should > somewhere > > > describe what differences are e

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [FFmpeg-cvslog] lavf/demux: stop calling avcodec_close()

2024-03-27 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 14:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 03:19:58PM +, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > ffmpeg | branch: master | Anton Khirnov | Thu Feb > 1 08:57:24 2024 +0100| [ca18bb597223b3df5bbf8a1836d157ba58b62570] | > committer: Anton Khirnov > > > > lavf/demux: sto

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 7.0 blocking issues

2024-03-25 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 21:10, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 09:20:25PM +0100, Lynne wrote: > > Mar 25, 2024, 14:50 by ffm...@haasn.xyz: > > > > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:20:56 +0100 "Jean-Baptiste Kempf" < > j...@videolan.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> On Mon,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for LC3 audio codec wrapper

2024-03-22 Thread Kieran Kunhya
> You've merged nothing yet and you want push access already? > I think this was done in good-faith saying they want to maintain. I wouldn't antagonise people for no reason. Kieran ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/flvenc: Avoid avio_write(pb, "", 0)

2024-03-21 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 13:13, Andreas Rheinhardt < andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote: > Andreas Rheinhardt: > > When the compiler chooses to inline put_amf_string(pb, ""), > > the avio_write(pb, "", 0) can be avoided. Happens with > > Clang-17 with -O1 and higher and GCC 13 with -O2 and higher

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] avfilter: add an LCEVC decoding filter

2024-03-19 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 15:27, James Almer wrote: > On 3/19/2024 12:20 PM, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 15:05, James Almer wrote: > > > >> On 3/19/2024 11:56 AM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: > >>> James Almer: > >>>> Signed-

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] avfilter: add an LCEVC decoding filter

2024-03-19 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 15:05, James Almer wrote: > On 3/19/2024 11:56 AM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: > > James Almer: > >> Signed-off-by: James Almer > >> --- > >> configure| 4 + > >> libavfilter/Makefile | 1 + > >> libavfilter/allfilters.c | 1 + > >> libavfilter

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] vvcdec: Mark as experimental

2024-03-15 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024, 22:54 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 10:55:18PM +0000, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 22:06, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:13 PM Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/mpeg4videodec: Align idct-block appropriately

2024-03-13 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 00:53, Andreas Rheinhardt < andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote: > It is accessed via AV_RN64() in ff_simple_idct_put_int32_10bit(). > Should fix the UBSan failures in the mpeg4-simple-studio-profile > test here: > > https://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20240312011016&s

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Indefinite ban request [RFC] Was: Re: [FFmpeg-trac] #10882(undetermined:new): swscale wastefully scales luma during yuv420p -> yuv422p

2024-03-12 Thread Kieran Kunhya
> > Dear LibAV core developer, thank you for this transcript. > If you feel like trolling, at least get your facts correct. Kieran ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, vi

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Indefinite ban request [RFC] Was: Re: [FFmpeg-trac] #10882(undetermined:new): swscale wastefully scales luma during yuv420p -> yuv422p

2024-03-10 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024, 01:25 Michael Niedermayer, wrote: > Hi everyone > > Some members of the CC want to indefinitely ban Balling > from trac. And as our doc/community.texi says: > "Indefinite bans from the community must be confirmed by the General > Assembly, in a majority vote." > > Thus some C

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] lavc: replace ff_thread_get_buffer() with ff_get_buffer()

2024-03-08 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 16:50, Nicolas George wrote: > Kieran Kunhya (12024-03-08): > > New contributors are not interested in your biased history lessons. They > > want to write code and have a modern, well run project, not a > dysfunctional > > mess. > > And we go b

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] lavc: replace ff_thread_get_buffer() with ff_get_buffer()

2024-03-08 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 16:41, Nicolas George wrote: > Kieran Kunhya (12024-03-08): > > Several recent contributors were in nappies during that piece of ancient > > history. Do you really need to bring it up incessantly and use it as your > > prism on every issue you disagree

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] lavc: replace ff_thread_get_buffer() with ff_get_buffer()

2024-03-08 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 15:46, Nicolas George wrote: > Sean McGovern (12024-03-08): > > It is really mean-spirited to make such comments about a project that is > no > > longer in operation. Can't we look forward instead of behind us? > > The project libav might be dead, but the people who made it

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 7.0 blocking issues

2024-03-08 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 15:04, Frank Plowman wrote: > On 08/03/2024 14:04, James Almer wrote: > > On 3/8/2024 11:02 AM, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > >> On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 14:00, James Almer wrote: > >> > >>> On 3/3/2024 4:35 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: &g

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 7.0 blocking issues

2024-03-08 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 14:00, James Almer wrote: > On 3/3/2024 4:35 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > > > > n Sat, 2 Mar 2024, at 23:55, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 08:22:41PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >>> Hi all > >>> > >>> As it was a little difficult for me

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Patch which requires a new library

2024-03-07 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024, 20:16 Sergio Garcia Murillo, < sergio.garcia.muri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 7:02 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont > wrote: > > > Le torstaina 7. maaliskuuta 2024, 19.30.46 EET Sergio Garcia Murillo a > > écrit : > > > > The point is we don't want to use the external

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Patch which requires a new library

2024-03-07 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024, 17:16 Sergio Garcia Murillo, < sergio.garcia.muri...@gmail.com> wrote: > El jue, 7 mar 2024, 16:30, Kieran Kunhya escribió: > > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 15:07, Sergio Garcia Murillo < > > sergio.garcia.muri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Patch which requires a new library

2024-03-07 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 15:07, Sergio Garcia Murillo < sergio.garcia.muri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Could anyone give me any pointers on what is the best way of doing this? > You should use a well known crypto library to implement this in FFmpeg (e.g libgcrypt, openssl etc). Kieran

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavcodec/vp9dsp: Convert vp9_vert_8x8_8bpp_mmx to sse2

2024-03-02 Thread Kieran Kunhya
$subj Old: vp9_vert_8x8_8bpp_c: 8.1 vp9_vert_8x8_8bpp_mmx: 2.4 New: vp9_vert_8x8_8bpp_c: 6.8 vp9_vert_8x8_8bpp_sse2: 2.3 0001-libavcodec-vp9dsp-Convert-vp9_vert_8x8_8bpp_mmx-to-s.patch Description: Binary data ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-deve

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavcodec/h264pred: Remove pred8x8_horizontal_8_mmxext

2024-03-02 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 at 21:18, Andreas Rheinhardt < andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote: > Kieran Kunhya: > > $subj > > > > Old: > > pred8x8_horizontal_8_c: 6.8 > > pred8x8_horizontal_8_mmxext: 8.6 > > pred8x8_horizontal_8_ssse3: 4.8

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] libavcodec/h264pred: Remove pred8x8_horizontal_8_mmxext

2024-03-02 Thread Kieran Kunhya
$subj Old: pred8x8_horizontal_8_c: 6.8 pred8x8_horizontal_8_mmxext: 8.6 pred8x8_horizontal_8_ssse3: 4.8 New: pred8x8_horizontal_8_c: 9.2 pred8x8_horizontal_8_sse2: 12.2 pred8x8_horizontal_8_ssse3: 4.9 0001-libavcodec-h264pred-Remove-pred8x8_horizontal_8_mmxe.patch Description: Binary data _

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding

2024-02-20 Thread Kieran Kunhya
The TC is doing this for the good of the project (I hope) and not to push their own agenda and it's very clear in this case there is no personal agenda. Regards, Kieran Kunhya ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ff

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg TC input needed

2024-02-17 Thread Kieran Kunhya
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 13:16, Gyan Doshi wrote: > > Whilst s302m multiple substreams I haven't seen, Dolby E streams > internally > > contain multiple programs, often 5.1 and a 2.0 downmix. > > That is downstream of the Dolby-E decoder and user will have to use a > filter like channelsplit to bif

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >