Hi Rostislav et all,
The IETF document has just been moved to a working group last call.
Do you think it would it be possible to land this patch under an
experimental flag?
Cheers,
Drew
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:28 PM Rostislav Pehlivanov
wrote:
> On 23 April 2018 at 17:02, Drew Al
Hi Rostislav,
Here is my feedback:
I am sorry, I don't agree that this should be merged quite yet.
First of all, the draft upon which how the channel family is interpreted
(draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-04) isn't finalized yet. What if it changes
after we make a release? We can't really change it.
heers,
Drew
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:57 AM Drew Allen wrote:
> Friendly weekly ping about this patch.
>
> Can someone please let me know if I need to do anything more to submit
> this patch? Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:13 AM Drew Allen wrote:
>
>> Friendly p
Friendly weekly ping about this patch.
Can someone please let me know if I need to do anything more to submit this
patch? Thanks!
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:13 AM Drew Allen wrote:
> Friendly ping to allow this to push to the member list, please.
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:58 PM D
Friendly ping to allow this to push to the member list, please.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:58 PM Drew Allen wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My name is Andrew Allen and I'm a contributor to Opus, supporting new
> channel mappings 2 and 3 for ambisonics compression. I've attached a
Hello all,
My name is Andrew Allen and I'm a contributor to Opus, supporting new
channel mappings 2 and 3 for ambisonics compression. I've attached a patch
to support the new OpusProjectionEncoder and OpusProjectionDecoder APIs for
handling the new channel mapping 3 in OPUS.
Please let me know of
