On 1/15/25 2:10 AM, Peter Ross wrote:
Fixes ticket #10658.
---
libavcodec/leaddec.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/leaddec.c b/libavcodec/leaddec.c
index 88387902ca..12e27061e9 100644
--- a/libavcodec/leaddec.c
+++ b/libavcodec/leadde
On 1/14/25 7:36 PM, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
---
libavformat/flv.h| 5
libavformat/flvdec.c | 63
2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavformat/flv.h b/libavformat/flv.h
index 74d3b8de8b..d8f7980f2e 100644
--- a/libavformat/
Fixes ticket #10658.
---
libavcodec/leaddec.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/leaddec.c b/libavcodec/leaddec.c
index 88387902ca..12e27061e9 100644
--- a/libavcodec/leaddec.c
+++ b/libavcodec/leaddec.c
@@ -164,6 +164,10 @@ static int lead_d
Fixes: applying zero offset to null pointer
Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer
---
libavutil/avstring.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavutil/avstring.c b/libavutil/avstring.c
index 2071dd36a59..875eb691db6 100644
--- a/libavutil/avstring.c
+++ b/lib
---
libavformat/flvdec.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavformat/flvdec.c b/libavformat/flvdec.c
index b4ea984f58..029992fc23 100644
--- a/libavformat/flvdec.c
+++ b/libavformat/flvdec.c
@@ -1439,6 +1439,10 @@ retry:
goto leave;
}
+if
---
libavformat/flv.h| 5
libavformat/flvdec.c | 63
2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libavformat/flv.h b/libavformat/flv.h
index 74d3b8de8b..d8f7980f2e 100644
--- a/libavformat/flv.h
+++ b/libavformat/flv.h
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@
On 1/14/2025 4:51 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
James Almer (12025-01-14):
The GA is a list of currently active contributors
Please, let us avoid that simplistic mistake.
The GA is an attempt at an approximation of a list of active
contributors.
That's no different than what i stated. If someon
James Almer (12025-01-14):
> The GA is a list of currently active contributors
Please, let us avoid that simplistic mistake.
The GA is an attempt at an approximation of a list of active
contributors.
Why 20 commits, not 19 or 21? Because it's round: arbitrary.
Why 36 months, not 35 or 37? Same,
The array will be allocated as needed in the loop below.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
libavformat/mov.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/mov.c b/libavformat/mov.c
index 138120488a..1c36d7dc4a 100644
--- a/libavformat/mov.c
+++ b/libavformat/mov.c
@@ -3659,9 +36
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 10:17:33PM +0100, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Patches attached
> rgb2rgb.c | 20 ++--
> swscale.c |5 -
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> f5fd376dd156a850939bbde60171972ab0b29a98
> 0001-swscale-x86-swscale-Move-some-constant
On 1/14/2025 3:30 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
Michael Niedermayer (12025-01-13):
The xz exploit situation is documented publically straight on wikipedia
and in more details in the references one can follow from there
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor
Indeed. But that came later.
F
On 1/14/2025 2:06 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Hi
To come back to this, and iam not sure this is the best mail to reply
to (i think there was a better one)
but thres a glaring missconception, see below
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:38:07PM +0100, Niklas Haas wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:17:31
Michael Niedermayer (12025-01-13):
> The xz exploit situation is documented publically straight on wikipedia
> and in more details in the references one can follow from there
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor
Indeed. But that came later.
FIRST, they kicked the spooks out, revoked
Hi
To come back to this, and iam not sure this is the best mail to reply
to (i think there was a better one)
but thres a glaring missconception, see below
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:38:07PM +0100, Niklas Haas wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:17:31 +0100 Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
[...]
> >
Andreas Rheinhardt:
> Patches attached
>
Will apply these patches and my two others tomorrow unless there are
objections.
- Andreas
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe,
On Mon, 2025-01-13 at 13:10 +, Frank Plowman wrote:
> The logic in export_frame_params relies on the assumption that
> s->pix_fmt and c->pix_fmt always correspond to one another (although
> they are not necessarily equal to one another in the case of
> hardware-accelerated decoders). Consequen
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 5:01 AM Rubén Gonzalez
wrote:
> I tested your ([PATCH v2] lavc/vvc/refs: export keyframe and picture type
> in output frames) implementation and it works correctly.
>
> For instance, I found different output from my original implementation in
> SUBPIC_D_ERICSSON_1.bit[1].
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 4:58 AM Rubén Gonzalez
wrote:
> IIRC This is needed for raw bitstreams and muxed videos. I did a fast test
> [1] and only patched version works.
>
> [2] https://www.elecard.com/storage/video/NovosobornayaSquare_640x360.mp4
Could you clarify the real use case for the key f
Signed-off-by: abdo
---
libavfilter/vf_signalstats.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_signalstats.c b/libavfilter/vf_signalstats.c
index b1451cc465..9b6af8becd 100644
--- a/libavfilter/vf_signalstats.c
+++ b/libavfilter/vf_signalstats.c
@@ -20,
19 matches
Mail list logo
